What's new

Concert photography

Rayburn

TPF Noob!
Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Location
Hilton Head Island, SC
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
So, I LOVE shooting concerts. I have been doing it more and more with some good response, but although I know I need the f2.8L (Canon guy), I've been making do with a 28-105mm f4L for now, with the occasional 50mm f1.8 thrown in. Are there any other concert shooters out there? Tips/tricks? Here are a couple of my most recent that folks have liked for an idea...
 

Attachments

  • $Dusters7_A.webp
    $Dusters7_A.webp
    2.8 MB · Views: 113
  • $Dusters3.webp
    $Dusters3.webp
    1.4 MB · Views: 98
I've shot a concert or two here and there.

Under professional lighting conditions, f/4 is fine. I routinely shoot up to f/6.3 or f/8, and my ISO is never above 1600. You don't "need" the f/2.8 under those conditions but, hey, "need" is such an ugly little word.

The shots you posted seem to be smaller venue stuff and, yeah, lighting can be a bear. I would be lying if I said I never decided to just pack my gear up and enjoy the show because the lighting was so bad...
 
As you are already aware, screwy lighting, changing colors, changing intensities, pose significant problems in shooting concerts, or, in my case, church activities.

It's a big-time 'battle' with the exposure triangle. Paramount, of course, is stopping subject (and yours) motion. Having a lens with Image Stabilization is good to have, but not essential. The tradeoff with non-IS lenses is you'll need either a faster shutter speed and higher ISO to stop camera motion. Of my current 4 lenses, only the 24-105 f4L has IS. I'm fortunate enough, though, to be able to drag around a monopod with ballhead while I'm shooting, to make up for the lack of IS. In the 4 day church event shoot I just finished Sunday, I found 1/200 gave the most non-blurred subject results. 1/160 did well, but not as successfully as 1/200. I tried 1/125 with the 24-105, but 1/125 wasn't successful at stopping action during the bell choir concert. So, limited pretty much to 1/160 and 1/200 shutter speeds, I had to decide what ISO and apertures to use to get what I wanted. In a couple of very low light situations, I was near shooting wide open at f2.8 and ISO 10000. But most of the time I was in the 1/160th and ISO 4000-5000 range...at or near wide open.

In looking through the results of about 2500 shots, I think next time, I'll try Tv at 1/200 and let the camera figure out what combination of ISO and aperture it wants...limiting ISO to 8000. That way, I won't have throw-aways every time the lighting changed. But then, when I want to get a wider DOF than 12" or so (from 30-50 feet away), I'll switch back to manual and get what I want. Bottom line...while f4 lenses and slower ISOs (camera limits) will get some decent results, having the right 'artillery' greatly increases the number of shooting options and improved results.

Here's a couple of results. The first is with the 135 f2L at f2.5, 1/160 and ISO 8000. The second, the 'magic drainpipe' 80-200 f2.8L, wide open, 200mm, and ISO 5000.
$7X5A8337.webp$7X5A8084.webp
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom