Critique!

[photopro379]

I'm going to have nightmares about that plastic head.

As well you should. Old navy has the creepiest mannequins on earth.

 

[Superfitz]

Do you shoot raw or JPEG?

 

[amolitor]

You've got some sort of an idea in #1, but I can't make out what it is. These elements COULD all work together to say something or other, potentially. If this was just a case of "hey, that looks cool" then you're going to have to move on from that to make any sort of a job out of photography. Documenting things that look cool to you isn't a marketable thing.

The second one is a cute little idea, not very well executed. I don't think the idea is much more than cute, though.

There are both things to stick up on the interwebs and share with your friends for a bit of a laugh, but they're not gonna turn into income.

 

[emdiemci]

This has to be someone pulling our leg. Late April fool? I dunno I give up.

 

[DanOstergren30 5]

This has to be someone pulling our leg. Late April fool? I dunno I give up.

I was thinking the same thing.

 

[cgipson1]

This has to be someone pulling our leg. Late April fool? I dunno I give up.

Hint hint > http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/general-shop-talk/332917-wedding.html

 

[DanOstergren30 5]

First of all, neither of these photos belong in the People Photography forum.

Second, I must ask what exactly it was that inspired you to have either of these subjects in front of your camera? There is just no value to either shot in my opinion, as a mannequin head in a department store and a couple of toys next to a confused looking dog just hold zero value, nor do they show any sense of creative effort or thought put into the photographs. My critique would be to choose better subjects and to put more effort into your art direction. And get a second job.