Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A lot depends on what sort of portraits (studio, ambient-light only, candid, etc) you want to shoot, but in general, hamlet's advice is good.
I've owned both. Unless you intend shooting at very high iso constantly buy the d7100. Even if hi iso all the time, the difference is minimal for shots where you don't need big raw buffer and an af that focuses in a little less light
Why are you even asking so?
Supposedly not on d7200. But I never saw it on 71 either
Supposedly not on d7200. But I never saw it on 71 either
Which would you go for?
Supposedly not on d7200. But I never saw it on 71 either
Which would you go for?
If you've owned the 7100 before, get the 7200. Otherwise, you're just going to itch to have one and get one eventually anyway. I've only owned the 7000 and 7100. If I had to by a 7x00 again, I'd probably get the 7100 just because it does everything I need it to. I've never seen banding either.
Supposedly not on d7200. But I never saw it on 71 either
Which would you go for?
If you've owned the 7100 before, get the 7200. Otherwise, you're just going to itch to have one and get one eventually anyway. I've only owned the 7000 and 7100. If I had to by a 7x00 again, I'd probably get the 7100 just because it does everything I need it to. I've never seen banding either.
Is there any logical reason other than improved AF and larger buffer to spend an extra 300-400$? Especially with just portraiture?