D7100 + Tamzooka......... + Nikkor 1.4 TC II = ...............

[480sparky]

..........not so bad!


Full capture, resized for posting (NO post editing!):

100% crop:

(EXIF data will read 600mm as the TC does not adjust the focal length. But this will be, in reality, 840mm. And with the D7100's crop factor, that an equivalent 1260mm FOV.)




FYI: My Nikkor TC is shaved, allowing it to be used on this lens.

 

[TWright33]

Not bad for an image taken at 3/4 of a mile.

 

[480sparky]

Not bad for an image taken at 3/4 of a mile.

Actually, it's more like 75 feet.

 

[TWright33]

Not bad for an image taken at 3/4 of a mile.

Actually, it's more like 75 feet.

I didn't think I had to actually explain I was aware it wasn't 3/4 of a mile.....

 

[hamlet]

Not bad for an image taken at 3/4 of a mile.

Actually, it's more like 75 feet.

Take one with a 50mm for point of reference, and then bring out the tamron. Also take a picture of moiré inducing patterns and we can have a look

 

[robbins.photo]

Not bad for an image taken at 3/4 of a mile.

Actually, it's more like 75 feet.

I didn't think I had to actually explain I was aware it wasn't 3/4 of a mile.....

Yes, we'll need a chart. And a graph. Also, you must always phrase it in the form of a question.

 

[PaulWog]

Take one with a 50mm for point of reference, and then bring out the tamron. Also take a picture of moiré inducing patterns and we can have a look

This thread has absolutely nothing to do with moire. At all.

 

[sifelaver]

This thread has absolutely nothing to do with moire. At all.

So how about that rumored D9300? What do you think?

 

[hamlet]

Take one with a 50mm for point of reference, and then bring out the tamron. Also take a picture of moiré inducing patterns and we can have a look

This thread has absolutely nothing to do with moire. At all.

I'm sorry, it was an honest question from curiosity.