slackercruster
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 761
- Reaction score
- 65
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Ofcourse is not all about the sensor. That's why Canon still popular. It's all about the whole package. I was questioning him the need of that long explanation. Nobody is saying something bad about Nikon.
How can Canon have a 21mp FF dslr for $2400 and Nikon D700 is priced higher and has much less MP for the $?
Canon Direct Store- EOS 5D Mark II Body
Wow, your looking at buying a D700? And your asking questions like this?? this is the sort of statement a person with a compact camera makes. Do some reading my friend and learn about photography before buying a D700. You are clearly believing that just because a camera has a higher megapixel count it is BETTER! Which is just plain wrong...
Are you saying the Nikon will out shoot the Canon?
Yes, I am a newbie to dslr's. (Not to film slr's) 40 years ago I used to have all Nikon equipment, then got out of it. And don't diss the compact cams. I've seen some fabulous photos from them.
As I look around now, I see lots of pro's in the outdoors / adventure mags giving credit to the Canon...very little credit goes to Nikon. So that what I was looking at.
I am not interested in all the BS crap they keep loading the cameras up with. Am interested in taking sharp pictures with good contrast and tonality, reliabilty, ease of use and great glass. Nikon seems to have some of the best glass around. But Canon also has good glass.
So what distinguishes these 2 cameras at hand beside the MP between cameras of the same size sensor?