Date needed

[Trever1t]

bleep bleep beep [my time machine is counting back to 11:49] come'on Mishele!

 

[KmH]

Is it possible to put a date onto digital images that I already have.

No. After your "I hope you have a **** weekend." I retract my information.

 

[Trever1t]

if he retained that digital file.

 

[480sparky68 67]

As an electrician, I can supply the 1.21 gigawatts required.

 

[KmH]

That's nice, you horrible prick.

All that was needed, was for you to say that this forum is not used for things that I am asking for.

I hope you have a **** weekend.

Thank You!, for joining TPF and being a contributing TPF forum member.

 

[480sparky68 67]

if he retained that digital file.

He doesn't have an old photo. He wants to take a new one and add a date from 2006 to make it LOOK like it was taken 5 years ago.

In other word, submit falsified documents into what I assume would be a court case.

 

[Kerbouchard]

if he retained that digital file.

He doesn't have an old photo. He wants to take a new one and add a date from 2006 to make it LOOK like it was taken 5 years ago.

In other word, submit falsified documents into what I assume would be a court case.

Which would be a ridiculous requirement from anybody. It's easy to make any digital file 'look' as old as one wants as long as they know how to change a date or time on their camera or computer.

I can't imagine a 'dated' photo would be needed for anything, precisely because of how easy it would be to manipulate.

Now, the odds are that what is in the picture looks very different than it did 5 years ago. That would be a much more reliable way of telling how old a photo is to somebody that knows the property.

Heck, most of the time when people post photos here they accidently delete the EXIF data without having ever known it existed to start with.

The requirement is silly. The OP's reactions are silly. And it is ridiculously easy to fake a digital time stamp. It would be much more difficult to have the shadows in the right place for the season, the same plants in bloom, etc. Probably something the OP hasn't even thought about.

 

[Robin Usagani]

Damn.. I clicked on the thread because I wanted to see if you are a female, how old, and maybe a self portrait. I thought you were looking for a date

 

[480sparky68 67]

.......Now, the odds are that what is in the picture looks very different than it did 5 years ago. That would be a much more reliable way of telling how old a photo is to somebody that knows the property.

Heck, most of the time when people post photos here they accidently delete the EXIF data without having ever known it existed to start with.

The requirement is silly. The OP's reactions are silly. And it is ridiculously easy to fake a digital time stamp. It would be much more difficult to have the shadows in the right place for the season, the same plants in bloom, etc. Probably something the OP hasn't even thought about.

But I'm sure opposing counsel will scrutinize any image submitted quite thoroughly.

"I see you have a print here, with a date of July 17, 2006 on it. Was it taken with a digital camera, sir?"

"Why, yes it was."

"Do you still have the image file?"

"Why, yes I do."

"May I load it onto my laptop?"

"Why, yes you may." (Lawyer loads image).......

"Well, Mr. Forger. The date on the print says July 17, 2006. But the image data recorded by the camera says it was taken three days ago. How do you account for that?"


Or..........

"Do you still have the camera you took that photo with?"

"Why, yes I do."

"What make and model is it?"

"It's a Crap-O-Camera."

"What is the model number?"

"Hmmm. Let me look..... Here it is.... it's a model Xr-17Q."

"Interesting. The model of camera you are using did not exist five years ago. It was first introduced in 2009. Can you explain that?"

 

[KmH]

Hey!

The guy just wants to join 'The Smartest Guys in the Room' club: The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron

 

[Tee]

I'm curious as to what search words went into Google to find this forum with regards to this topic?

 

[mrpink]

But I'm sure opposing counsel will scrutinize any image submitted quite thoroughly.

"I see you have a print here, with a date of July 17, 2006 on it. Was it taken with a digital camera, sir?"

"Why, yes it was."

"Do you still have the image file?"

"Nope."

Or..........

"Do you still have the camera you took that photo with?"

"Nope."



If you are going to forge a document and submit it to a court, why would you be truthful in any other aspect of the case?





p!nK

 

[H4X1MA]

Try a street view of google maps lol

 

[480sparky68 67]

.............If you are going to forge a document and submit it to a court, why would you be truthful in any other aspect of the case?.........

Well, the OP has already displayed his lack of integrity.

 

[mishele]

<---------------- would like a time machine ride.........just sayin.