Denali

[JustAnEngineer]

Mt. McKinley. Denali National Park:

1:

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee120/JustAnEngineer/Alaska/Denali/IMG_2336.jpg
EOS 40D, 100-400L, circular polarizer: 100mm, f/4.5, 1/2500s, ISO400

2:

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee120/JustAnEngineer/Alaska/Denali/IMG_2365.jpg
260mm, f/5.6, 1/1000s, ISO100

3:

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee120/JustAnEngineer/Alaska/IMG_2548.jpg
170mm, f/5.6, 1/3200s, ISO800

4:

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee120/JustAnEngineer/Alaska/IMG_2594.jpg
100mm, f/8, 1/125s, ISO100


5:

http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee120/JustAnEngineer/Alaska/Denali/IMG_2600.jpg
100mm, f/10, 1/400, ISO400



I'm considering having #4 printed as a poster. Suggestions?

 

[JustAnEngineer]

The 2½ MP JPEGs that I've linked above are all straight out of the camera. I have a few others that I slightly underexposed to avoid blowing out the white glaciers that needed a bit of adjustment.

With the 3888 x 2592 raw file, I was considering a print up to 52 x 34 inches (at 75 dpi). I've never had anything printed that big, but there's a spot over the sofa for one that large (or two smaller prints).

 

[paul85224]

They are all rather nice.

 

[Reece Man]

They are all a little underexposed. Bump your highlights a little bit or maybe add some contrast.

 

[Reece Man]

 

[Reece Man]

Looks a little different on the internet than it does in my computer but you get the idea of what I'm saying.