Drunk Bully gets one hit KO'd

Majeed Badizadegan · Mar 15, 2013

^ You're not taking into consideration that no one he assaulted fought back. The drunk guy was going to continue to assault people until someone stopped him. Somebody did.

You have a problem with how it was done.

I do not have a problem with how it was done.

Simple disagreement

.

Heitz · Mar 15, 2013

punching someone in the temple like that with enough force to knock him out for an extended period is really reckless.

jwbryson1 · Mar 15, 2013

Rotanimod said:
You're playing Devil's advocate.

Of course I am, but I am making a good point. I'm just saying that in my opinion, and you are welcome to disagree with it, the hitter would have been on firmer ground if he had waited for the exact moment when the guy touched somebody and then knocked him the Eff out. The drunk was barely touching people--he never actually threw a punch in the video, he was just being an obnoxious prick and poking people and asking for somebody to come at him.

Michael79 · Mar 15, 2013

He deserved it no matter where it came from! The boom was hilarious, maybe he was annoyed with the whistling?

If the 2 guys were girls and the guy jumped in everyone here would be applauding him.

jwbryson1 · Mar 15, 2013

Heitz said:
punching someone in the temple like that with enough force to knock him out for an extended period is really reckless.

Absolutely! If the drunk guy dies, know what happens next? The hitter will be arrested for homicide. Simple. Could he claim self defense? If I was on the jury, I would say no. But that's not for me to decide.

Majeed Badizadegan · Mar 15, 2013

You supply the puzzle pieces. I put them together:

jwbryson1 said:
Absolutely. The guy who threw the punch was never touched, so he can't claim self defense. At the time he hit the guy, he wasn't stepping in to prevent the drunk guy from hurting somebody---he sucker punched him and the drunk never saw it coming. So, at that moment in time, the drunk guy was the victim and the hitter was the aggressor.

jwbryson1 said:
LOL.

Good luck with that case. I don't think many judges or juries would agree with that.

Benco · Mar 15, 2013

Two wrongs don't make a right. The drunk **** was guilty of assault, the bloke who hit him was guilty of battery and probably ABH. Both deserve to get done for their actions.

Majeed Badizadegan · Mar 15, 2013

Heitz said:
punching someone in the temple like that with enough force to knock him out for an extended period is really reckless.

How do you know he punched him in the temple? Serious question. His head is blocking the angle of the blow.

It could've just as easily been the guys chin, which is often referred to by boxers as "the button". A spot on the chin or around the jaw that, when hit with enough force, knocks the brain around in the skull enough to render someone unconscious.

Michael79 said:
He deserved it no matter where it came from! The boom was hilarious, maybe he was annoyed with the whistling?

If the 2 guys were girls and the guy jumped in everyone here would be applauding him.

Yeah in this case I don't think it matters. The guy assaulted 3 people with no end in sight.

Benco said:
Two wrongs don't make a right. The drunk **** was guilty of assault, the bloke who hit him was guilty of battery. Both deserve to get done for their actions.

Yeah. But I bet the police don't look very hard for this guy. Just my guess.

O'Rork · Mar 15, 2013

If you're going to talk the talk, you better be able to walk the walk. Protect yourself at all times. The Bully was a fool.

Michael79 · Mar 15, 2013

Benco said:
Two wrongs don't make a right.

In this situation 3 lefts got him a right hahaha

Majeed Badizadegan · Mar 15, 2013

Michael79 said:
In this situation 3 lefts got him a right hahaha

:hail:

Benco · Mar 15, 2013

Majeed Badizadegan · Mar 15, 2013

jwbryson1 said:
Rotanimod said:

You're playing Devil's advocate.

Click to expand...

Of course I am, but I am making a good point. I'm just saying that in my opinion, and you are welcome to disagree with it, the hitter would have been on firmer ground if he had waited for the exact moment when the guy touched somebody and then knocked him the Eff out. The drunk was barely touching people--he never actually threw a punch in the video, he was just being an obnoxious prick and poking people and asking for somebody to come at him.

At 0:24, the drunk clearly landed a left jab on the guys face. The guy who got punched was grimacing in pain from that point forward. Are you being serious, or just trolling?

Tuffythepug · Mar 15, 2013

Heitz said:
punching someone in the temple like that with enough force to knock him out for an extended period is really reckless.

Not that it makes much difference but for the sake of accuracy if you slow it down and watch frame by frame you clearly see the fist making contact with the lower part of his jaw at the 29.5 second mark. I suppose it could have easily broken his jaw; He may not be whistling for awhile. the guy threw his whole body into that punch. You're gonna go down when you're hit like that; I don't care who you are.

And jwbryson1 you said the drunk guy never actually threw a punch; What was that at the 24 second mark ? Looks like he punched the guy in the eye while he was just standing there and clearly not wanting any part of a fight. 5 seconds later the aggressor is "neutralized".