Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well, keep in mind that everyone says the D3s is about 1 to 1.5 stops better at high ISO than the 1D4. If you divide the DXO score for the D3s by 3, you'll see that it's just shy of 3x's better (or 1.5 stops - more like 1.2 or so).a bit surprising, I thought 1DVI would be closer to the D3s then it would be to the 1DIII.
I think most of us were hoping the 1D4 would be full frame and go more the Nikon route. Perhaps doing 18mp on a full frame and then having the 1Ds4 being something like a 30mp full frame.So I am very curious, why did the 1D4 come out as a cropped sensor? I mean, can you even consider it a 'full frame' camera?
It all means nothing because you will very rarely be shooting over ISO6400 and will not notice the difference between shots at iso6400
Eh, I can comfortably push the 1D4 to ISO 10,000 without any issues in terms of degraded IQ.It all means nothing because you will very rarely be shooting over ISO6400 and will not notice the difference between shots at iso6400
Regarding your Nikon question, be aware that Nikon (in-camera) clips the black level noise (i.e. if you looked at a histogram the entire left side of the histogram would be chopped off). This "Nikon clipping" means random noise will not average out if you shoot many frames and average the results to reduce noise (i.e. Nikon isn't the greatest camera if you shoot stars). OTOH "Nikon clipping" makes for a lower value of StdDev and therefore DR calculations are better (also improved is the appearance of noise in the shadows).
Edit -- To give you a better feel for what is going on I should mention the Nikon in-camera clipping is worth one stop when you perform DR calculations. That said, the latest Nikon offerings are better than one stop compared to Canon; other factors that favor Nikon include a better CFA and sensor with higher efficiency.
BTW, just so you know, Canon's DPP at its default settings also clips the black level noise but not nearly as much as Nikon's in-camera clipping; this is one of the reasons why ACR conversions (with the black slider set to zero) show more noise than DPP renderings.
Regards,
Joe Kurkjian
For "photojournalistic" use, ISO 12800 is quite usable on the 1D4 too. Well, that is unless you think this shot taken at 12800 with my 1D4 isn't print quality for a newspaper (I know that it is):Well, Canon shooters will not want to go over 6,400, since that is about the top usable ISO setting the 1D IV can muster...the D3s pulls ahead as ISO levels go up, with 12,800 and 25,600 on the Nikon looking quite usable for photojournalistic use. But then again, that's to be expected with larger pixels, fewer pixels, and a sensor that is 1.66x larger than the 1D IV sensor is.
I think most of us were hoping the 1D4 would be full frame and go more the Nikon route. Perhaps doing 18mp on a full frame and then having the 1Ds4 being something like a 30mp full frame.So I am very curious, why did the 1D4 come out as a cropped sensor? I mean, can you even consider it a 'full frame' camera?
The 1.3 will likely end with this body, but we all thought that last time around.