Not bad, however 1 (and to a lesser degree #2) really suffers from lack of fill. They have serious racoon eyes, and it looks like some noise due to shadow/under-exposure recovery. I wish that the dogs were either both looking at the camera or each other, but with one looking each way it loses a bit.
I think #2 should have either been far enough away to include the whole hand, or close enough to really see the ring in detail.
#3; good, solid shot and #4 will be a nice memory shot.
Rule #1 - never, ever, EVER go anywhere without extra light in your pocket!If you shot these as raw files and edited in LR, you shouldn't need to start again.
Not bad, however 1 (and to a lesser degree #2) really suffers from lack of fill. They have serious racoon eyes, and it looks like some noise due to shadow/under-exposure recovery. I wish that the dogs were either both looking at the camera or each other, but with one looking each way it loses a bit.
I think #2 should have either been far enough away to include the whole hand, or close enough to really see the ring in detail.
#3; good, solid shot and #4 will be a nice memory shot.

