What's new

Enlarging pictures

twgreen3 said:
... before sending to wallgreens.

OK... here's my reasoning: I made the presumption that the least amount of resultion would be 254 DPI, say... like a Durst Epsilon. I figure the Frontier is likely to be 300, although some models are at 320. So, I advised 254 figuring the lab could "take it from there" without an appreciable loss. I forgot where I was. Thanks for keepin me on my toes.

-Pete
 
I didn't mean to keep anybody on the toes.... in fact I misunderstood your answer quote, since the emphasis was on wallgreens, you could've known they've had a printer there working at 254 dpi

What's Durst Epsilon? I know the company makes enlargers... and that's it. :)
 
Surely you find out what dpi they require when you investigate the service... don't you?
 
My reasoning is pretty much any printer is probably above 254, so it is probably compatible. And knowing what 254 looks like, I say just go with that. I think you'd have to struggle to see any difference.
 
jadin said:
My reasoning is pretty much any printer is probably above 254, so it is probably compatible. And knowing what 254 looks like, I say just go with that. I think you'd have to struggle to see any difference.
But then you might as well leave the resizing to the lab and not bother at all.

Bottom line - if you're going to resize, you need to know the printer and the size. Your sharpening technique depends on both of those variables.
 
DocFrankenstein said:
But then you might as well leave the resizing to the lab and not bother at all.

Bottom line - if you're going to resize, you need to know the printer and the size. Your sharpening technique depends on both of those variables.

That's exactly what I said. The 254 dpi is from not doing anything and just letting the lab handle it.
 
When I used a lab that had a Fuji, they told me to send them 300 DPI files. When I send a file to my Epson 2200, I use 300 DPI even though I print at 2880 DPI. I have been told that 300 is a somewhat universal file format for the vast majority of photo quality printers.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom