Family photos I took 2 years ago vs recently

[paigew]

I shoot objects moving at at over 100mph. I shoot in the rain. I shoot in the dirt. I shoot in dark rooms. I shoot in below freezing temperature. I capture once in a life time moments that require instant focus. I also use my iPhone to take pictures of my kids.

well I guess we can agree to disagree then

 

[ManualMode]

vtec44, Sorry I did add 'mm' after 50....I didn't realize you didn't know how to use the search feature.

btw sorry Robin for your thread being hijacked

Wow.. harsh.

 

[ManualMode]

Wwwwait.. is someone arguing that a kit lens is equal in quality to a good prime?
Bwahahahaha! Ohh.. ok.. sure it is.

Remember that a kit lens is designed in such a way to keep a camera within a very finite price point.
When most of that price point is based on the quality/features of the body the golden triangle of the lens would be:

Price Low vs. Quality vs. Versatility

 

[Robin_Usagani]

Wwwwait.. is someone arguing that a kit lens is equal in quality to a good prime?
Bwahahahaha! Ohh.. ok.. sure it is.

Where do you see that? If you know what you are doing and understand the limitation and under the right condition a kit lens can produce amazing results. Most people that use kit lens don't use it at its full potential. Nobody ever argued that the kit lens is equal in quality.

 

[ManualMode]

Wwwwait.. is someone arguing that a kit lens is equal in quality to a good prime?
Bwahahahaha! Ohh.. ok.. sure it is.

Where do you see that? If you know what you are doing and understand the limitation and under the right condition a kit lens can produce amazing results. Most people that use kit lens don't use it at its full potential. Nobody ever argued that the kit lens is equal in quality.

Of course it can produce amazing results.. but you get what you pay for. Many non-kit lenses exceed the cost of camera + kit lens; there's a reason why.
I've never found a Kit Lens as sharp as primes - ever.

 

[Vtec44]

Talk is cheap post more photos. I don't think my 70-200 f2.8 VR2 is as sharp as my 105 f2.8 VR2 and it costs more than double. lol

 

[Tee]

"Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms."

really? hmmm....

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/search.php?searchid=1904282

This linky no workee. Try again. That's what Vtec was trying to tell you.