Far or Near?

[Frequency]

Imo, they are completely different photos, with very different messages...based on my own interpretations, of course. Both have qualities I like. I'll write more when I'm off the iPhone.

I am eagerly waiting for that

Far:
I don't know how you did the lighting, but it's beautiful! It looks like it glows, in a natural way. I like the lifeless (in lack of a better word) background. Or rather, "soon-to-be-lifeful" background. I'm not sure about the English word for those "un-finished" flowers, but this image shows what they one day will become. They may be ugly, grey and lifeless, but they sure will grow into something beautiful. This sounds cliché, but that was what I though. It can apply to many a situation, something people might relate to - or somehow relate to similar situations. Of course, I have no idea why you shot it like that, but that is my interpretation.
One thing, though. I wish you had included the entire thing in upper right corner, as it plays an important part in my interpretation

Near:
Same as before about the lighting. It's beautiful. The flower is razor sharp. Beautiful close-up. Did you use a flash coming from image right?

Ohh, and I never intended to post twice, the phone messed up, and I posted again...but the first one came through anyway...

All glows are natural and All Glory to Nature !!!! i was a mediator between Nature's Creative excellence and Camera's technological sophistication
Regards