- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 10,726
- Reaction score
- 5,467
- Website
- sm4him.500px.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Almost embarrassing to post my feeble attempts at bird photography in here, but this is where we've been told to put them so that's what I'll do.
Definitely a beginner in bird photography; been trying out my new 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6 lens, and one of the things I wanted it for was to start doing some bird photography.
Side note: Every time I talk about woodpeckers, in my head, THIS is what I hear:
So anyway. I haven't had time to go to the nature center close to me, or up to the mountains, so I've had to settle, so far, for my backyard. I sneak out in the morning before work and try to find something besides a mockingbird or a starling.
Yesterday, there was a cardinal, but the closest I got to was still probably over 200 feet away, so this is the best I got:

Shutter: 1/400, f/5.6, 300mm, 3200 ISO (not sure why I had it that high, might have just forgotten to change it)
This morning, I tried to go out and stalk the bird feeder; as usual, the bird that was there flew off before I could get to a good angle. As it flew off, I saw a flash of red and wondered if it was the woodpecker I'd been hearing for weeks. It flew into the nearest tree, but was on the reverse side from me, so I couldn't see. I decided to just stand and wait, to see if it would ever come around to the near side. I was finally rewarded, although it was still probably a good 200 ft. or so away from me.
Downy Woodpecker:

Shutter: 1/400, f/5.6, 300mm, 400 ISO
Closer crop of same photo:

I can never seem to get the sharp details, and I'm not sure if it's because I'm shooting from too far away (which I can't really help, since it's the closest I've been able to get to them so far), or if it's because I'm shooting at the farthest range of my lens, 300mm, or something else, or a combination of things. Would I be better off to shoot at 200mm and crop the image? I need to try that when I get some time, but my sense is I'd lose just as much sharpness by cropping as I would be shooting at the far end of the lens' range.
This morning, I was able to get MUCH closer to a robin--probably about 15-20 feet, but the details are still not sharp. This makes me think I DO need to just try shooting at 200mm or so instead of the full 300mm capability of the lens. Or, maybe I'm just missing focus?? I will say, these were taken while walking down a hill carrying my camera bag, my work backpack and my purse, so I wasn't able to keep the camera as steady as I might have been able to otherwise (though, with my hand tremor, that is always a challenge anyway).
Robin:


Both robin photos have the same exif data as the Woodpecker, because my hands were too full to change any settings.
C&C if you like...or just keep listening to the Woody the Woodpecker laugh...
Definitely a beginner in bird photography; been trying out my new 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6 lens, and one of the things I wanted it for was to start doing some bird photography.
Side note: Every time I talk about woodpeckers, in my head, THIS is what I hear:
So anyway. I haven't had time to go to the nature center close to me, or up to the mountains, so I've had to settle, so far, for my backyard. I sneak out in the morning before work and try to find something besides a mockingbird or a starling.
Yesterday, there was a cardinal, but the closest I got to was still probably over 200 feet away, so this is the best I got:

Shutter: 1/400, f/5.6, 300mm, 3200 ISO (not sure why I had it that high, might have just forgotten to change it)
This morning, I tried to go out and stalk the bird feeder; as usual, the bird that was there flew off before I could get to a good angle. As it flew off, I saw a flash of red and wondered if it was the woodpecker I'd been hearing for weeks. It flew into the nearest tree, but was on the reverse side from me, so I couldn't see. I decided to just stand and wait, to see if it would ever come around to the near side. I was finally rewarded, although it was still probably a good 200 ft. or so away from me.
Downy Woodpecker:

Shutter: 1/400, f/5.6, 300mm, 400 ISO
Closer crop of same photo:

I can never seem to get the sharp details, and I'm not sure if it's because I'm shooting from too far away (which I can't really help, since it's the closest I've been able to get to them so far), or if it's because I'm shooting at the farthest range of my lens, 300mm, or something else, or a combination of things. Would I be better off to shoot at 200mm and crop the image? I need to try that when I get some time, but my sense is I'd lose just as much sharpness by cropping as I would be shooting at the far end of the lens' range.
This morning, I was able to get MUCH closer to a robin--probably about 15-20 feet, but the details are still not sharp. This makes me think I DO need to just try shooting at 200mm or so instead of the full 300mm capability of the lens. Or, maybe I'm just missing focus?? I will say, these were taken while walking down a hill carrying my camera bag, my work backpack and my purse, so I wasn't able to keep the camera as steady as I might have been able to otherwise (though, with my hand tremor, that is always a challenge anyway).
Robin:


Both robin photos have the same exif data as the Woodpecker, because my hands were too full to change any settings.
C&C if you like...or just keep listening to the Woody the Woodpecker laugh...

Last edited by a moderator: