Help Identifying Camera from the 30s

Discussion in 'Collector's Corner' started by pachipachi, Oct 27, 2018.

  1. pachipachi

    pachipachi TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello,

    I have a difficult question and I hope that even if I will not be able to get an answer someone here can help me a little with forming a clearer idea about it.

    I have an album of photographs from a relative from the years 1935-36. The photographs were taken in Africa, but the camera used for them was bought in Italy. The camera itself is lost. The prints are sized (in cm) 4x5.5, 5x5, 4x6, 5.5x8, with the smallest sized photos being contact prints. I have a very blurry detail in one photo of the person who took the pictures wearing what I assume is the camera case, which looks like the case of a folding camera, but as I'm no expert I am not sure if the case can be of any use to identify the camera.

    I am including the detail so that you can see it.


    crop_camera_case.jpg


    I know this is very little information, but any clues about which model may have taken the pictures based on age of the photographs, prints size and on camera case will be more than welcome, thanks!


     
  2. IanG

    IanG No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Turkey or West Midlnads UK
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    You've no chance, except for the format if the smallest prints are contact prints it's a 6x4.5 camera taking 120 or 620 film, it won't have been a 127 camera. The only other thing that you can be fairly sure of it was a folding hand camera.

    Of course not all the negative may have been made with the same camera, the shape and dimensions of the case seem to indicate a 6x9 camera, and not a 6x4.5. that's based on similar cases I have, should add with no built in range=finder that would affect the shape. There were so many manufacturers you can't get any better idea.

    Ian
     
  3. pachipachi

    pachipachi TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you for the reply. I also noticed there is some discrepancy with the size of the prints and the shape of the case, so I assumed some of the photos may have been taken with a different camera, even though perhaps not necessarily his own.
     
  4. compur

    compur Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    637
    Location:
    L.A.
    This reminds me of the people on eBay who try to sell vintage cameras displaying photos that only show closed camera cases with, presumably, the camera inside. They don't bother to take them out of the case for the photos or even open the case to let us see any part of the camera and expect people to buy or bid on them. A pig in a poke, anyone?
     
  5. tirediron

    tirediron Watch the Birdy! Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    44,237
    Likes Received:
    13,920
    Location:
    Victoria, BC
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I'm not even sure that is a camera case; The pouches below appear to be pre-WWII-era rifle ammunition pouches which would make them about ~4" tall x 2 1/4" wide. Even accounting (generously) for parallax error, that would make the case in question too small, IMO, to be folder of that time period.
     
  6. bogeyguy

    bogeyguy No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2011
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    155
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, Pa.
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I agree. ammo cases, not sure what the longer case would be, but military fro sure.
     
  7. pachipachi

    pachipachi TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand the doubt about the size. The case appears, but much less clearly because of the posture of the person which hides almost entirely, in another photograph. In others you can only see the strap, not the pouch itself. I assumed it's a camera case not only for the general shape, but because the person is often seen with the thing slinged around the body, even in pictures where the military apparel is not being worn at all, so it means it's from something that he was constantly taking with him (which I thought would make sense with a camera?)

    As for the ebay reference, haha, well at least I'm not trying to sell anything. As I said, the camera itself is long gone. I was just trying to do some historical research on the photographs and trying to understand which camera may have been used to take the photos.

    Thanks all for the inputs.
     
  8. Derrel

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    44,546
    Likes Received:
    16,940
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The case in the lower left hand corner looks a LOT like the Bell & Howell Filmo Straight Eight movie camera cases of that era. The case seen near the shirt pocket does not look like a camera case of that era, to me at least.
     
  9. webestang64

    webestang64 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    May 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,519
    Likes Received:
    747
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO. USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Do you have a local History or Military Museum? Someone there might be able to help identify the objects in the photo.
     
  10. compur

    compur Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    637
    Location:
    L.A.
    There were folding cameras that used 127 film and produced a 4x6.5 image in the 1930s (and earlier). They were quite small. Not much larger than a deck of cards when folded. For example, the Zeiss Piccolette and others from Germany, Japan and USA. Kodak called folding 127 cameras "Vest Pocket" cameras. Image formats varied from 4x6.5 down to, I believe, 4x3.
     
  11. IanG

    IanG No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Messages:
    371
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Turkey or West Midlnads UK
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    4x5.5 is the image are of a 6x4.5 negative, just as 5.5x8 is the image area of a typical 6x9 camera.

    Ian
     
  12. compur

    compur Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    637
    Location:
    L.A.


    True but I don't think there's a 120/620 sized film camera in that little case.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page
vintage camera collector
,

where to sell vintage cameras