Hertz van Rental said:...b&w crit gallery too.
terri said:Get to 10K, already.![]()
JonMikal said:ok, i'm there, now where's the b&w gallery :mrgreen:
ok then, how about a separate forum for b&w and IR stuff. :lmao:
just smack me and i'll go away![]()
terri said:I don't think this is gonna work, but.....
![]()
Hertz van Rental said:How about a compromise? We could open the JonMikal Gallery....
um.....yeah!! It's like that.Hertz van Rental said:I put up a list of how I thought the Galleries should be labeled a while back - if you remember.
I don't like the idea of differentiating between Digital and Film because it pays too much attention to the method of production and ignores the image itself.
If you split B&W and Colour you would have to do duplicate Galleries for each subject - or split each Gallery in two. Problematic. And like Digital/Film it would take the attention away from the image and place it on the method of production again.
Hertz van Rental said:I put up a list of how I thought the Galleries should be labeled a while back - if you remember.
I don't like the idea of differentiating between Digital and Film because it pays too much attention to the method of production and ignores the image itself.
If you split B&W and Colour you would have to do duplicate Galleries for each subject - or split each Gallery in two. Problematic. And like Digital/Film it would take the attention away from the image and place it on the method of production again.
People never see things as problematic when it's someone else who has to solve the problemJonMikal said:only if you see it that way