@ chito beach: Not a lost art, but when it takes so little effort to elicit feedback, what’s the downside for the question poster? Too much information of doubtful truthfullness? They already get that from the marketing documentation. At worse, they get more regurgitation of what they already have read. At best, someone will come back with “yeah, did this, tried that, ended up with X for the following reasons, and after Y months, am pretty happy”. It doesn’t mean that the responder’s views are 100% relevant to the OP, but it gives a external point of reference, as noted in re reply by “themedicine”.
Overread also has a point – for most beginners, where DO you turn for real advice? Product brochures? Aside from the clearly biased slant of these, you still need to have a certain amount of basic knowledge in the field to parse many of the specs and claims into useful information, something that beginners usually don’t have. Few belong to a camera club before buying their camera, and the sales staff at the local photo emporium is usually driven by commission incentives, so their “advice” is instantly suspect. The quality of information from the internet forums is uneven, but not obviously biased to one product or another, or to making a sale.
Derrel’s point is very valid. This dilemma was described in a Scientific American article a few years back. Another aspect of this issue is that there are two modes of decision-makers: the “good-enough” and the “maximizers”. The “good-enough” make a choice that is good enough, then move on. The “maximizers” hold off making a decision because they are afraid of making a choice they would regret. The maximizers try to look at all the choices and having made the decision, come back and revisit their decision, second-guessing, if you will. Few people are exclusively one or the other type, but if someone is mostly a maximize, they tend to spend a lot more time agonizing over the decision. Guess which type needs to get the maximum amount of information…