pugnacious33
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 757
- Reaction score
- 21
- Location
- MS Gulf Coast
- Website
- soundinsights.blogspot.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I'm very impressed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
. It also dosent do well at all at taking extenders (was not designed to). .
. It also dosent do well at all at taking extenders (was not designed to). .
Really? I thought it was supposed to work well with the Canon extenders. I keep thinking that one of these days I want to get the 100-400 or the 400 f/5.6 (since it is unlikely that I will be able to afford my dream, the 500mm f/4, in a nearby lifetime) and, if that is really the case, I would lean hard towards the prime.
. It also dosent do well at all at taking extenders (was not designed to). .
Really? I thought it was supposed to work well with the Canon extenders. I keep thinking that one of these days I want to get the 100-400 or the 400 f/5.6 (since it is unlikely that I will be able to afford my dream, the 500mm f/4, in a nearby lifetime) and, if that is really the case, I would lean hard towards the prime.
You would be happier with the prime lens .Primes always have better IQ than a zoom. The reason people like the 100-400 so much is its versatility but to be honest the image quality of say the 400 5.6 (same ballpark price of the 100-400) is better.
Really? I thought it was supposed to work well with the Canon extenders. I keep thinking that one of these days I want to get the 100-400 or the 400 f/5.6 (since it is unlikely that I will be able to afford my dream, the 500mm f/4, in a nearby lifetime) and, if that is really the case, I would lean hard towards the prime.
You would be happier with the prime lens .Primes always have better IQ than a zoom. The reason people like the 100-400 so much is its versatility but to be honest the image quality of say the 400 5.6 (same ballpark price of the 100-400) is better.
I just wish Canon would put IS on it ...