I can't quite figure out whats wrong with this>

[rokvi]

Me jumping in

:cheers:

 

[OscarWilde]

You can lessen the CA by lessening your focal length (if you were at the outer reaches of your lens) and/ or lowering your aperture a bit...

I'm sure there are other ways but I know those two help a bit

 

[AaronLLockhart]

Yes, your right. next time I think I'll use f/11 instead of 20! and remember to calculate the hyper focal distance. That should work.

It seems you have answered your own question. That's what it looks like to me immediately, is diffraction from using a small aperture. Even the most "in focus" part of the image is not crystal clear. What were you using on this, 10 second shutter?

 

[rokvi]

Yes, your right. next time I think I'll use f/11 instead of 20! and remember to calculate the hyper focal distance. That should work.

It seems you have answered your own question. That's what it looks like to me immediately, is diffraction from using a small aperture. Even the most "in focus" part of the image is not crystal clear. What were you using on this, 10 second shutter?

ISO 100 f/20! ( To lazy to walk back 30m for my filters) 0.4 sec.

 

[rokvi]

You can lessen the CA by lessening your focal length (if you were at the outer reaches of your lens) and/ or lowering your aperture a bit...

I'm sure there are other ways but I know those two help a bit

Fanks :thumbsup:

 

[AaronLLockhart]

ISO 100 f/20! ( To lazy to walk back 30m for my filters) 0.4 sec.

Wow, that water must have been moving pretty rapidly. I would not have guessed less than half a second at all!

 

[rokvi]

ISO 100 f/20! ( To lazy to walk back 30m for my filters) 0.4 sec.

Wow, that water must have been moving pretty rapidly.

Very!