Compaq
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 3,400
- Reaction score
- 657
- Location
- Norway
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I am taking a course called "Academic Writing". For the next four weeks, I will compare and contrast something of my own choice. What I write about matters less than how I write it. More specifically, I wanted to write a about how analog and digital photography differ, what they have in common and whether analog photography still have merit to the average Joe.
Now, the challenge is that statements I make must be backed up; I need evidence to prove my points. If I were to write: "Whereas much of digital photography's attraction lies in its instant results, much of analog photography's attraction lies in the exact opposite.", I would need some source to back up the statement. I can't just say it and not back it up - that would imply it's only my own opinion. My opinion on the matter is worthless by itself, I need to write objectively and persuasive by showing that authorities think this as well. I want to show that analog photography still have merit, but since this isn't a blog post, I need to back up statements to show that what I'm writing actually is true.
That said, what I wanted some help with is finding sources. This is a photography forum, with both analog and digital users, do some of you have links to articles, essays, news paper reports/interviews or any other material that is believable and that can be fully cited?
Thank you in advance,
Anders
Now, the challenge is that statements I make must be backed up; I need evidence to prove my points. If I were to write: "Whereas much of digital photography's attraction lies in its instant results, much of analog photography's attraction lies in the exact opposite.", I would need some source to back up the statement. I can't just say it and not back it up - that would imply it's only my own opinion. My opinion on the matter is worthless by itself, I need to write objectively and persuasive by showing that authorities think this as well. I want to show that analog photography still have merit, but since this isn't a blog post, I need to back up statements to show that what I'm writing actually is true.
That said, what I wanted some help with is finding sources. This is a photography forum, with both analog and digital users, do some of you have links to articles, essays, news paper reports/interviews or any other material that is believable and that can be fully cited?
Thank you in advance,
Anders