PixelRabbit
A naughty little bunny...
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 6,593
- Reaction score
- 3,719
- Location
- Ontario
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Oh Runnah, yes I tried other conversions but couldn't bring out the best in both sky and land in them, perhaps my edit prior to the conversion is in need of some help to get a less "dark" edit to work.
Thanks Manny, I'll take all the 2 cents I can get, they ALL teach me!#1 I like, but it seems to me that the rocks are competing way too much with the sky . # 2 I like better I just wish that maybe you had a little more sky . My 2 cheap cents .![]()
Thanks Doug, I'll revisit the blacks.comment on technicalities of the image, Make sure you blacks are black. your whites are definitely white, expose the image via Lightroom slightly more and voilá!
Hey TI like both of them, great shots. But, you know me, always a "but" I would do some changes. #1 how you see, in opinion of many has less impact, and no wonder. But I like it better as it has better potential (in the form you presented it to us) than #2. (IMHO). In #2 I would eliminate the stairs, it is a foreign object in this harmony of nature. In #1 you have three distinctive bands of landscape: sky, water and rocks. The problem is, that they are not very much distinctive in this shot. You had to compromise the exposure I guess. Much of the highlights lost texture and there is not much 100% black. This creates the feel of flatness. There is no solid cut between the water and sky. Play a bit with burning of the three elements at different ratios and see, how it will change the feel of the landscape, especially the rocks. Simply add drama and depth and let see.
Oh Runnah, yes I tried other conversions but couldn't bring out the best in both sky and land in them, perhaps my edit prior to the conversion is in need of some help to get a less "dark" edit to work.
I would try NOT bringing out the 'best' in both land and sky. What I mean is - in that first shot, there is so much going on in both halves that, as other have said, it's too much to look at. What's interesting, though, is how the tones and shapes are mirrored, so I wonder how it would look if you kept the contrast in one half - probably the land - and muted the tones in the sky to make it look more like a "reflection," (obviously not a literal reflection) so the hints of mirrored tones and shapes are there but they aren't so strong on their own that they challenge the bottom half of the picture.
I think that's why the second picture works better - there's much less sky to distract from the expanse of beach and water. And I do like the stairs on the left side of that shot.