look at these pics and tell me what camera was used

[truetrue]

http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/...a-used-12212_527557623921084_1962140001_n.jpg
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/...a-used-73496_527557737254406_1619064610_n.jpg

THESE PICS ARE RECENT
COULD SOMEONE PLEASE TELL MY HOW CAN I ACHIEVE THIS KIND OF PICTURE
THANKS GUYS :thumbup:

 

[LaFoto]

If these photos are not yours, you're not supposed to post them here.
As to your question, I'd say: camera phone...

And check your cap locks - they seem to be stuck.

 

[truetrue]

sorry for the cap, moderator.
i can tell you i can post these photos for legal

camera phone doesn't do that

 

[terri]

If these are your images, then it's okay to post them. To answer your question, any camera could have taken these, really - the first is underexposed and very grainy, either from film or digital ISO. Same with the second one, though the exposure is better. There is no trick lens or special camera needed for images like these.

 

[Patrice]

Almost any old camera, film or digital, could have done that. A scanned exposure from a 110 could be better than that.

Underexposed, not very sharp, uninspired composition.

(Pointless thread!)

 

[Robin_Usagani]

trolling? LOL

 

[jamesbjenkins]

trolling? LOL

Yes. And not even interesting trolling. A complete and udder waste of bytes.

 

[fjrabon]

OP, in all seriousness, I think it would take this camera to produce that sort of quality: Phase One IQ180 Digital Back with 645DF Body and 80mm Lens

 

[kathyt]

Looks like a Mark iii to me with an L lens.

 

[fjrabon]

Looks like a Mark iii to me with an L lens.

nah, you can't get that type of resolution and depth without medium format.

 

[ronlane]

Is that the Loch Ness Monster in the back ground?

 

[2WheelPhoto]

I bet my new (to me) cam wasn't the one used in the shots.

 

[jwbryson1]

I bet this photo would have been KILLER had he used some Pocket Wizards....Right 2 wheel? :smileys:

 

[fjrabon]

Actually, looking at it, it does seem like some wizardry may have been afoot. I detect a subtle fill light that has the unmistakable flavor of a pocket wizard coming from the right. It almost looks like a plus III, but it could be a plus II. Hard to tell given the ambient lighting.

 

[2WheelPhoto]

I bet this photo would have been KILLER had he used some Pocket Wizards....Right 2 wheel? :smileys:

Actually, looking at it, it does seem like some wizardry may have been afoot. I detect a subtle fill light that has the unmistakable flavor of a pocket wizard coming from the right. It almost looks like a plus III, but it could be a plus II. Hard to tell given the ambient lighting.

You guys rock