Hey all, first post on the forums here, so I figured I'd include some background. I haven't used an SLR camera since a film 35mm pentax I had for college courses, but I find myself taking photos quite often as of late, and I'm bumping up against the limitations of the digital cameras I now have (a sony point and shoot, and a couple of cellphone cameras), so I'm looking to jump up to a DSLR.
I mostly shoot landscapes and product photos, but occasionally go for wildlife and car shows. The sheer number of options out there has me on informational overload, so I thought I'd get some advice from people with more experience (you guys!).
I noticed a lot of the articles online seem to suggest Nikon D3300, Pentax K-S2, and Canon Rebel T6s camera bodies for beginners, would one of these be a good fit? Is there something else I should consider? In either case, what lens(es) should I look at starting out with?
Thanks in advance for any and all help!
This is just my own $.02...please use it only for what it's worth to you.
As I suspect you're beginning to surmise, any time you ask the question "which is best", there's a better than average chance that you're likely to start a heated debate....everyone has their favorite choices and personal opinions. As others have already mentioned, at the core with the brands given, Nikon, Canon and Pentax, all are fairly decent brands...more or less. In such a debate, my own personal opinion is simply this; it's NOT about the gear, it's about the person using it. The simple truth of the matter is that a
good photographer can do more with a simple point and shoot than a bad photographer can with the most expensive gear! That said, this is just my own experience...
While this should probably be taken with a pinch of proverbial salt, first and foremost I recommend that people, newbie or pro alike, AVOID CANON. I was a Canon shooter for MANY years...I had become an avid 35mm shooter back in the early 80's with an old Canon FTb (all manual) and when I finally decided to step into the realm of digital back in the late 90's, Canon had seemed the logical choice at the time and I purchased a Rebel XT. I was immediately disappointed in that wow...even though I had stuck with Canon, I had to go out and buy all new lenses because my old lenses would NOT fit the EOS system. Ok...I bit the bullet and bought some new lenses and for the most part, I was actually pretty happy with that Rebel. When it came time for me to step up to a semi-pro camera, I purchased a 40D...and here's where my problems began. The camera worked fine for about a year and a half...just long enough for the warranty to expire. Then one rather warm day while out shooting "tall ships", the camera started getting flaky and over the course of the next couple of months, the image quality, particularly in terms of grain/noise began getting increasingly worse, until 1 day I got the infamous and ever so ambiguous "E99 error"...before buying a Canon brand camera, it's worth Goggling this error. At this point the camera only had around 20,000 clicks on the shutter. I called Canon's customer service and was informed that this was a rather common error on these cameras and that the typical cost for a repair would be "around $100", so I boxed up the camera and sent it in. After a few weeks, when I had not heard back from the service center, I called them and was told that while they hadn't actually looked at the camera yet, the repair would likely be around $180. Hhmmm. A few weeks later I called back again, this time I was told that AGAIN they still had not looked at the camera, but that I should expect the repair to be $250 - $280...?????? Ok...wow. At that point I was starting to get suspicious, however I also wanted my camera back, so I bit my lip and tried to be patient. Finally, nearly 2 months after having sent the camera in initially, I received a call saying that they finally looked at the camera and
the repair would be $450! When I conveyed the information I had previously received, the ONLY thing the service/tech person had to offer was that I purchase a refurbished 40D for the same price!!!!!!!!! For well over 20 years I had been a loyal Canon user and I was truly outraged at the way I was treated. Needless to say, I simply had them send the camera back, un-repaired and used the money to buy a refurbished Nikon D90 instead...the camera I still use to this day! From my view point, Canon attempted what can be considered as little more than the ol' "bait and switch" con and in the time since, I've spoken with a number of people who've received this very same treatment...my situation was by no means unique. Obviously every major maker and brand of virtually ANYTHING has a few horror stories attributed to it's name, but personally I still feel that this whole situation was just WAY out of the ball park. As far as I'm concerned, Canon lost ALL credibility with such irresponsible tactics and service.
Now that issue aside...an issue that's rather significant to say the least...I also have to mention that after having purchased the refurb'd Nikon, I also noticed that the IQ of the Nikon was notably better than the Canon, particularly regarding the higher ISO ranges, even though both cameras were quite comparable on paper. I often had to struggle in Photoshop to clean up images from the Canon that were shot at ISO 1000 or higher, however with the Nikon D90 I can usually clean up the images quickly and effectively in Adobe RAW and have in fact shot some very decent quality images as high as ISO 3200. On that singular issue alone, even if I hadn't of had the very bad experience with Canon customer support that I did, I would easily recommend Nikon over the comparable Canon.
As far as Pentax goes, I will admit that I don't have much experience with this brand except to say that most people I've talked to say the newer Pentax lenses just don't really compare to other brands....and the reason I use a SLR/DSLR to begin with is so I can get fairly decent glass and have a few choices. This issue isn't AS significant with the 3rd party brands such as Tamron and Sigma (and I -am- very much a huge fan of Tamron lenses), however it's also been my experience that such brands are notoriously slower at releasing new lenses for Pentax and other brands than they are with Canon or Nikon. Likewise, when I was initially considering Canon and later changed over to Nikon, I did take a peek at some 3rd party lab results and while it's been a few years, at that time at least, the Pentax cameras didn't really compare with either Canon or Nikon regarding IQ....and that IQ fell off even further at higher ISO's. I do a fair amount of low light work on occasion, so that was a fairly large factor for me personally. This
could be very different today, however I'd do a bit of thorough research into the subject before making a purchase. As far as things like the aforementioned weather sealing goes...honestly, unless you're planning to be shooting in the desert or at the arctic poles, I just wouldn't sweat this. MANY people shoot comparable brands on a daily basis without the weather sealing...never seems to cause your average shooter much of a problem. Likewise, while this is strictly a personal opinion, -if- I had any interest in vibration reduction, I'd want it on the specific lens instead of the body anyways...it seems to me that the amount of VR you'd need for a 300mm lens would be significantly different than something in the 18 to 24mm range. Not sure an end all, be all system is really the way to go there.
As far as Pentax goes, the bottom line is this; -if- you already had a significant foot locker full of older Pentax glass, I would likely suggest Pentax...lenses are after all, a rather considerable investment. That said, I think I read that you only have the one 50mm, so for the difference, I'd probably knock Pentax out of the running...you're gonna need new lenses anyways.
So with all of this in mind, while again any of those brands would likely serve you well as a newbie to DSLR's and while like everyone, I certainly have my own personal opinions as well, personally I'd suggest the Nikon...without hesitation. I will say that if you're still considering the D3300 that you also take a look at the D5200 as well, as price and features are pretty comparable. Also, unless you have a specific need for a 24mp sensor (megapixels...talk about catch terms these days), while I hate to make the field even more confusing, you also may wish to consider a refurbished D90 or something similar as well, particularly if you're thinking about upgrading to a more pro body somewhere down the line. The nice thing about the D90 (and other mid-consumer Nikons) is that like Pentax, you can use older Nikon lenses and
sometimes you can find some real bargains. I've managed to snag a couple of older Nikkors for around $30 each and while both are manual, both are just sensationally sharp lenses. As always, do read comparative reviews and where ever possible, try to compare specific models side by side (as in walk into a camera store and compare real cameras with your own hands)...opinions on a forum can only go so far. Personally after all the problems I had with Canon and considering the Nikon seems to provide the best IQ for the work I do and how I shoot, I'll stick with Nikon...your mileage may vary.
Just my own opinions, but I hope it helps...good luck!