Model/Product Shot (self portrait)

[GooniesNeverSayDie11]

this is how its should be done man!

As for your picture, i think its well done. A bit more rim light would have been nice. I would frame it differently and remove the dead space on the left. Seems like you framed to comply with the ROT but a straight up shot like this on a plain white background, i would put you right on the center.

I heard a good one the other day......

Did you hear Chuck Norris has a Gmail account? Its gmail@ChuckNorris.com (NOTE: its not funny if I have to explain it )

 

[Ballistics]

I put the second pic in the OP

 

[e.rose]

E.rose, I heart you. That's all.

I :heart: you too! :hug::

 

[Ballistics]

Bump for the squared shoulder pic in OP.

 

[GrantH]

I like the squared shoulder picture a lot better. My only question, and this is completely nit-picking, is if you can get some detail back into your belt in PP? The knot and the loose end look a little blown out and grab my eye.

 

[H4X1MA]

Ballistics, have you tried comparing your image to another image from a martial arts catalog? I would say that that would be a good bet. My dad taught Tae Kwon Do for 20 year's so I know there are a lot of mags out there! He always used Century. Shot #1 has that product magazine feel but I think your posture is a bit timid. Are you trying to shoot the full uniform, or just the top? Full uniform I would think that you need full body in frame just to show the legs.

 

[Ballistics]

I like the squared shoulder picture a lot better. My only question, and this is completely nit-picking, is if you can get some detail back into your belt in PP? The knot and the loose end look a little blown out and grab my eye.

Actually, that was filled in with white on accident. I'll fix that. Thanks for picking that up.

 

[Ballistics]

blackroninmodelsqr by Compressed Memories, on Flickr

 

[LightSpeed]

I think we're all adults and capable of speaking for ourselves, but thank you.

Your comment was interpreted assuming you were a stranger to OP- bear that in mind.

No , you hit the nail on the head in your first reply.
You really did.