My husband thinks it's feminine and it made Bitter feel awkward. Here it is...

[Overread18 6]

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

You realise that at least 5 people (one of which might or might not be Erose) are now going to flood this thread with HUGE watermarks all over their photos - don't you?

 

[DarkShadow]

Very Nice selfie e-rose.I love the you and kitty avatar to.

 

[e.rose]

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

Me too, Bitter. Me too.

Pretty model.

Thanks. Especially since the "model" is me.

One catchlight rather than two would be better.

I dunno why that matters. Plenty of images have double catchlights. I placed the second light according to how I wanted it to fill, not to add or avoid a second catchlight.

The skin appears overprocesed.

Why? And don't you dare say there isn't any texture, cause there is lots of damn texture.

Wet you lips with your tongue

Am I supposed to be making a porno here? Or a Miley Cyrus promo, perhaps?

they look dry.

That's *probably* because of the makeup that I used to intentionally give them a nude, matte look.

The advertisement of the company drawers the eye away from and competes with the subject.

Good. Then people will know who to call when they want portraits done.

Nice shot.

Thanks. :sillysmi:

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

You realise that at least 5 people (one of which might or might not be Erose) are now going to flood this thread with HUGE watermarks all over their photos - don't you?

Nah. I won't. I'm too damn tired to do that right now.

 

[Derrel]

Plenty of skin texture in this photo when seen at full size. REAL pores. OMG---it's it's,it's,it's, well, it's like there was a real person in front of the lens. I greatly prefer this type of look to that glass-smooth, airbrush-y type skin rendering seen so often in the Photoshop era.

 

[The_Traveler]

Too lovely.

and if your husband is concerned because it looks feminine, perhaps you ought to sit him tell and give him the talk.

 

[e.rose]

Too lovely.

and if your husband is concerned because it looks feminine, perhaps you ought to sit him tell and give him the talk.

No, that's WHY he likes it.

 

[e.rose]

I just made a point to mention it, because "feminine" is not an adjective that is often associated with my personality.

 

[robbins.photo]

Am I supposed to be making a porno here? Or a Miley Cyrus promo, perhaps?

Seriously.. ok, do you honestly need a poll to answer this question? Lol

 

[e.rose]

Am I supposed to be making a porno here? Or a Miley Cyrus promo, perhaps?

Seriously.. ok, do you honestly need a poll to answer this question? Lol

I mean... aren't both those things really the same anyway?

 

[robbins.photo]

Am I supposed to be making a porno here? Or a Miley Cyrus promo, perhaps?

Seriously.. ok, do you honestly need a poll to answer this question? Lol

I mean... aren't both those things really the same anyway?

Nope. The porno would most likely be less hardcore.. lol

 

[e.rose]

Seriously.. ok, do you honestly need a poll to answer this question? Lol

I mean... aren't both those things really the same anyway?

Nope. The porno would most likely be less hardcore.. lol

S'true.

 

[DanOstergren28 4]

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

Me too, Bitter. Me too.

Pretty model.

Thanks. Especially since the "model" is me.



I dunno why that matters. Plenty of images have double catchlights. I placed the second light according to how I wanted it to fill, not to add or avoid a second catchlight.



Why? And don't you dare say there isn't any texture, cause there is lots of damn texture.



Am I supposed to be making a porno here? Or a Miley Cyrus promo, perhaps?



That's *probably* because of the makeup that I used to intentionally give them a nude, matte look.



Good. Then people will know who to call when they want portraits done.



Thanks. :sillysmi:

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

You realise that at least 5 people (one of which might or might not be Erose) are now going to flood this thread with HUGE watermarks all over their photos - don't you?

Nah. I won't. I'm too damn tired to do that right now.

Can we be best friends?

 

[DanOstergren28 4]

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

Seriously. :thumbup:

 

[e.rose]

I dream of a world, where people can see past watermarks.

:roll:

Me too, Bitter. Me too.



Thanks. Especially since the "model" is me.



I dunno why that matters. Plenty of images have double catchlights. I placed the second light according to how I wanted it to fill, not to add or avoid a second catchlight.



Why? And don't you dare say there isn't any texture, cause there is lots of damn texture.



Am I supposed to be making a porno here? Or a Miley Cyrus promo, perhaps?



That's *probably* because of the makeup that I used to intentionally give them a nude, matte look.



Good. Then people will know who to call when they want portraits done.



Thanks. :sillysmi:

You realise that at least 5 people (one of which might or might not be Erose) are now going to flood this thread with HUGE watermarks all over their photos - don't you?

Nah. I won't. I'm too damn tired to do that right now.

Can we be best friends?

Yes please!

(I mean... I was already kind of a stalker and added you on Facebook about 20 minutes ago so... you know... do with that what you will. )

 

[DanOstergren28 4]

LMAO!