What's new

need advice on 1st dslr

remark13

TPF Noob!
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
23
Reaction score
6
Location
Pa
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Looking to purchase 1st dslr and have been researching, probably too much. Currently using canon powershot 260. I seem drawn to Pentax k50, though really like the sound k3 also looking at nikon d5200/5300. Didn't like the feel of the canons. I take many photos of son's soccer team, wildlife (those pesky birds are hard to catch) ,pets, genral memories bdays etc, landscape and macro. I know it is alot to get out of a single camera, but here's hoping.
I have managed to get some great (ok in my mind) shots out of my P&S, but find the shutterlag extremely frustrating. I can only anticipate so much. Concerned about AF with pentax, but that 100% viewfinder very appealing compostion wise and the weatherproofing seems like a very good idea since good shots don't always happen in good weather. I am not concerned with video at all as I do not use it.
Budget, well @ $1,000 including say a lens like the 18-135mm. Though really best deal for $ and need. I know I will need to invest in other lens, but looking forward to getting started right away and this range seemed like a good start.
Thank you for any advice on which direction to go.
 
There is no right answer here but if in your shoes I would check out the Nikon d7000 with 18-105 Lens and the Pentax k5 ii with its 18-135 kit lens. Both are last years models so are good value. You say you don't like canon, is that just the smaller rebel models? The 60d with 18-135mm stm is solid value also
 
Thx. With canon it was the smaller rebels, which small isn't the problem, just didn't feel right. Also concerned being new to dslr, will probably need some ease of use though I have no problem playing around with things till I get it, so I was staying with better? entry models, but I don't want to out grow to quickly. Thank you again
 
Thx. With canon it was the smaller rebels, which small isn't the problem, just didn't feel right. Also concerned being new to dslr, will probably need some ease of use though I have no problem playing around with things till I get it, so I was staying with better? entry models, but I don't want to out grow to quickly. Thank you again

The 7000 will provide you with all the presets for a beginner and all the controls you need to grow
 
Upper model dslrs work similar to the lower Tier models. You won't find them harder to use, in fact many have more direct controls and are easier because of this.
 
I read part of dPreview's Pentax K-3 experience report...they call it a "semi-pro APS-C body". It does seem to be a cut above the run of the mill consumer-oriented d-slrs like the Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series models. Pentax DOES HAVE some nice lenses, designed specifically for a 1.5x sized sensor, like their 50-135mm f/2.8 higher-end zoom lens, and their 16-50mm f/2.8.

Pentax is the only company that seems to have truly made a lens lineup optimized entirely for APS-C cameras. RICOH Digital Camera Lens Lineup

Today, there are some good deals available on the D3200 and D5200 models, as well as the D7000.
 
Had to check a specks for d7000, have read too many reviews. I remember it now, but a few sites had the k 50 beating it overall....guess this is why I am asking for input. Derrel, thx for including info on pentax. Don't want to over think it too much, but I do want to make sure that the company I choose I will be happy with as it sounds like the bodies come and go, but the lenses tie you to the company somewhat. Looking at the prices for the higher end pentax lens does reaffirm that.
Definately appreciate everyones input so far. Keep it coming.Thx
 
The Sony a77 with the 18 - 135 comes in right around $1000. 100% viewfinder, weather sealed, magnesium body, 12fps for sports, full continuous AF. (Which you won't find on other brands) 24mp....
 
Had to check a specks for d7000, have read too many reviews. I remember it now, but a few sites had the k 50 beating it overall....guess this is why I am asking for input. Derrel, thx for including info on pentax. Don't want to over think it too much, but I do want to make sure that the company I choose I will be happy with as it sounds like the bodies come and go, but the lenses tie you to the company somewhat. Looking at the prices for the higher end pentax lens does reaffirm that.
Definately appreciate everyones input so far. Keep it coming.Thx

Well, you can't really go wrong with purchasing either, both are very good very capable cameras and will suit your stated needs fine. What I generally recommend for most folks looking to purchase there first DSLR is to research the camera your looking at buying now and make sure it will do what you need, but then in addition to that research the models that are newer and more expensive as well and look at what sort of features/benefits they offer.

When you buy a DSLR your not so much buying "just a camera", instead your buying into a camera system. Once you get a few lenses it gets expensive and time consuming to switch to another camera type. So what I would suggest is look at the D7000 (I'd throw the D5200 in there too, great bang for your buck IMHO) as well as the K50, then look at some of the more expensive offerings like the K-5 II and K-3, or on the Nikon side the D7100, D610, etc.

See if those cameras might be something you'd be looking for if and when you ever decide to upgrade. Then decide on what camera will best suit your needs today, and what system will most likely offer you the sort of things you might be looking for tomorrow.

Fortunately there is no wrong answer here, it's all just based on what you need and what you think will serve you best over the long haul.
 
Had to check a specks for d7000, have read too many reviews. I remember it now, but a few sites had the k 50 beating it overall....guess this is why I am asking for input. Derrel, thx for including info on pentax. Don't want to over think it too much, but I do want to make sure that the company I choose I will be happy with as it sounds like the bodies come and go, but the lenses tie you to the company somewhat. Looking at the prices for the higher end pentax lens does reaffirm that.
Definately appreciate everyones input so far. Keep it coming.Thx

Well, you can't really go wrong with purchasing either, both are very good very capable cameras and will suit your stated needs fine. What I generally recommend for most folks looking to purchase there first DSLR is to research the camera your looking at buying now and make sure it will do what you need, but then in addition to that research the models that are newer and more expensive as well and look at what sort of features/benefits they offer.

When you buy a DSLR your not so much buying "just a camera", instead your buying into a camera system. Once you get a few lenses it gets expensive and time consuming to switch to another camera type. So what I would suggest is look at the D7000 (I'd throw the D5200 in there too, great bang for your buck IMHO) as well as the K50, then look at some of the more expensive offerings like the K-5 II and K-3, or on the Nikon side the D7100, D610, etc.

See if those cameras might be something you'd be looking for if and when you ever decide to upgrade. Then decide on what camera will best suit your needs today, and what system will most likely offer you the sort of things you might be looking for tomorrow.

Fortunately there is no wrong answer here, it's all just based on what you need and what you think will serve you best over the long haul.

To add on to robbins' quote, you can't go wrong with buying both.
 
Morning.
Was looking at the sony line...love those fps and 24 mp BUT the EVF lag etc? With the sports, birds and children looking for as fast as I can get realtime view, shutter response and fps. Ugh. Also is this line part of the mirrorless set? Didn't realize it was weatherproof though thanks. Is this just for a77 or does it include the a65.
 
Wish I could afford to outfit both:D
edit:, but will need to make a choice, so a big thanks to you all. At least it sounds like you really can't go wrong with either. Anyone shot with Pentax have input regarding AF etc for teen sports and birding or should I post that in the pentax forum? Love real advice on use vrs review.
 
Last edited:
Morning.
Was looking at the sony line...love those fps and 24 mp BUT the EVF lag etc? With the sports, birds and children looking for as fast as I can get realtime view, shutter response and fps. Ugh. Also is this line part of the mirrorless set? Didn't realize it was weatherproof though thanks. Is this just for a77 or does it include the a65.

There's no evf lag. and no it's not mirrorless. It has a fixed see through mirror which is how it's able to have fast FPS, and continuous AF. Oh and no the a65 is not weather proof.

Trust me, in this price range, you're not going to find a faster camera.
 
This Amazon reviewer explains it well, little long but well written -

My rating reflects the camera as a whole. I bought it, use it and love it, but I'm going to take a different approach here and review one aspect of this camera: the viewfinder.

Most of the professional reviews I've found for the Sony a77 (dpreview, etc) are entirely missing the point. The electronic viewfinder alone is reason enough to consider this camera a step up from a traditional DSLR, even if the DSLR you were comparing an a77 with had identical specs. I'd say the a77's viewfinder is a pleasure to use (and it is), but even that is missing the point.

This viewfinder will change the way you use your camera. It'll change it for the better because it gives you greater control over the camera than you've ever had before.

Because the viewfinder is an OLED video screen in the eyepiece instead of being a typical piece of glass, you're seeing something entirely different. Something more useful.

An optical viewfinder shows you what the lens is seeing. An electronic viewfinder shows you what the sensor is doing. Think about that for a moment. Let's say you own a Nikon D7000 and you boost exposure compensation. Do you see any change in the viewfinder? Of course not. You'll see that change in the photo you take. That's how SLRs have always worked, even back in the days before digital. Ah, but with the electronic viewfinder in a Sony a77, when you boost exposure compensation, you'll see the image in the viewfinder become brighter, just as the shot you take will be brighter.

An even simpler example: Look through the viewfinder of a DSLR and choose an exposure point. Pick a dark spot. Nothing changes in your viewfinder, right? Pick a bright spot. Do you see any change in the viewfinder? Of course not. But, in the a77 viewfinder, you see the exposure change because the viewfinder is showing you what the camera is doing rather than only showing you what the lens is seeing.

Here's how most of us probably used our DSLRs: You pick the camera up to your eye. You look through the viewfinder to frame your shot, etc. You take the shot and then pull the camera away from your eye so you can review the shot you just took, using the LCD screen on the back of your camera "Ah, shoot. Blown highlights." You lower exposure compensation, put the camera viewfinder to your eye, frame up the shot again and take it again. Then check it again on the LCD screen on the back of the camera.

In other words, it's a game of switching from viewfinder to LCD, LCD to viewfinder, etc etc etc. Back and forth.

With the electronic viewfinder in the Sony a77, you don't have to do that anymore. You can literally see the changes you're making in the viewfinder. And, better still, you can set up your viewfinder to review the shot you just took for 2 seconds (or 5, though I find 2 to be enough). So, you take the shot and immediately see the shot you just took without moving the camera.

This electronic viewfinder is an absolute pleasure to view, and it can do some amazing things.

Want a level laid over the shot you're about to take? Put it in your viewfinder.

There's an excellent tele/crop feature in the a77 that drops the 24 megapixel sensor down to 12 and doubles the length of your lens' reach. Thus, a 50mm lens becomes a 100mm lens, and you're seeing this change perfectly in the electronic viewfinder.

There's also an option to check your focus. Click a button and the viewfinder will show you a super-zoomed in view so you can check the precision of your focus. There is absolutely no way this sort of thing can be done with an optical viewfinder.

I've seen so many reviews talking about the weaknesses of electronic viewfinders in comparison to optical viewfinders, but they fail to mention the weaknesses of optical viewfinders. Now that I've made the switch to an EVF, I'd really hate to have to switch back. After using the viewfinder in this Sony a77 for a day or two, you'll realize just how limiting an old fashioned optical viewfinder really is.

Specs only tell you what a camera is capable of, but as we all know, photography isn't about the camera. It's about the photographer and the photo taken. The viewfinder in this camera will give you, as a photographer, more control over your camera than you've ever known. The buttons and dials give you control over the camera, but the EVF literally puts you inside the camera. It's an awesome experience. I suspect that, ten years from now, most DSLRs will have electronic viewfinders.
 
Looking to purchase 1st dslr and have been researching, probably too much. Currently using canon powershot 260. I seem drawn to Pentax k50, though really like the sound k3 also looking at nikon d5200/5300. Didn't like the feel of the canons. I take many photos of son's soccer team, wildlife (those pesky birds are hard to catch) ,pets, genral memories bdays etc, landscape and macro. I know it is alot to get out of a single camera, but here's hoping.
I have managed to get some great (ok in my mind) shots out of my P&S, but find the shutterlag extremely frustrating. I can only anticipate so much. Concerned about AF with pentax, but that 100% viewfinder very appealing compostion wise and the weatherproofing seems like a very good idea since good shots don't always happen in good weather. I am not concerned with video at all as I do not use it.
Budget, well @ $1,000 including say a lens like the 18-135mm. Though really best deal for $ and need. I know I will need to invest in other lens, but looking forward to getting started right away and this range seemed like a good start.
Thank you for any advice on which direction to go.

Check out the D3200. Its currently on a sale from Adorama for $379 over 200 off retail. It has 24mp sensor and does full HD video. It also has guide mode which is great for helping someone new to the DSLR.

PS, stay away from Pentax lol. They look great on paper and have cool pancake lenses. However, getting lenses, flashes and anything else you may need is outrageously expensive and hard to find.

Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom