D-B-J
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2010
- Messages
- 9,027
- Reaction score
- 2,175
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
The D7000 is a GREAT camera. Can't compare it to the D300 because I've never used one. Entry-level or not, it's still a good camera
Thing is, once you pick up a D300 and spend a few minutes playing with it, the D7000 will feel like a toy afterwards. If I was accustomed to shooting with a D300, stepping down to the lighter, smaller, more plastic D7000 would be a VERY tough move.
OP, I say wait a bit longer, I have a feeling the D400 is going to be an amazing camera. I also have a bad feeling it's going to cost somewhere around $2,200-2,600, because of the predicted $4k cost of the D800.
Even though I know it won't happen, I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to see the D400 come out as a pro body style with the built in grip (ala D3 series), just with a DX sensor. There really is a need for a camera like that in the sports world, but I don't see it happening unless they release an additional DX model above the D400.
I disagree. I shot with a D200 for about two years, then upgraded to the D7000. I can't complain. Sure, without the grip, it was a "toy" compared to my D200. However, with the grip on, and a 80-200 mounted, it's a great camera. It performs well, has much better ISO capability, etc. Granted, it's not a full magnesium-alloy body, as well weather sealed, and a few other minor things. But to be honest, I am glad i chose the D7000 over the D300s (that's what i was comparing initially).