Nikon d7100 vs Nikon d600

[deutsh]

.If you have them all you are the winner ....belive me.
.[/QUOTE]

Winner of what? I am not following. What will I win?[/QUOTE]

Winner of the ultimate sharp pro looking photos with(sharp in center and edge ,no distortion ,in low light satuation you can take photos,and various lenses between ultra wide ,standard and zoom) If he get (nikon D800E+12-24 mm f/2.8,24-70mm f/2.8,70-200mm f/2.8) and them all are cost 7000$.and thats is all.

 

[Benco]

.If you have them all you are the winner ....belive me.

Winner of what? I am not following. What will I win?

Winner of the ultimate sharp pro looking photos with(sharp in center and edge ,no distortion ,in low light satuation you can take photos,and various lenses between ultra wide ,standard and zoom)If he get (nikon D800E+12-24 mm f/2.8,24-70mm f/2.8,70-200mm f/2.8) and them all are cost 7000$.and thats is all.

That's down to the lenses, put fast glass on one of the 'junk' cameras and you can get all that.

 

[480sparky]

Winner of the ultimate sharp pro looking photos with(sharp in center and edge ,no distortion ,in low light satuation you can take photos,and various lenses between ultra wide ,standard and zoom) If he get (nikon D800E+12-24 mm f/2.8,24-70mm f/2.8,70-200mm f/2.8) and them all are cost 7000$.and thats is all.

And if your budget is $1000........ all that top-shelf hardware is as useful as a wad of used chewing gum.

BTW, owning a Trinity does not give you 'pro looking photos'.

 

[o hey tyler]

Winner of the ultimate sharp pro looking photos with(sharp in center and edge ,no distortion ,in low light satuation you can take photos,and various lenses between ultra wide ,standard and zoom) If he get (nikon D800E+12-24 mm f/2.8,24-70mm f/2.8,70-200mm f/2.8) and them all are cost 7000$.and thats is all.

Psssst! Your limited photographic and optical knowledge is showing!

 

[gryffinwings]

Winner of the ultimate sharp pro looking photos with(sharp in center and edge ,no distortion ,in low light satuation you can take photos,and various lenses between ultra wide ,standard and zoom) If he get (nikon D800E+12-24 mm f/2.8,24-70mm f/2.8,70-200mm f/2.8) and them all are cost 7000$.and thats is all.

And if your budget is $1000........ all that top-shelf hardware is as useful as a wad of used chewing gum.

BTW, owning a Trinity does not give you 'pro looking photos'.

Of course we know technique is what matters. But it certainly helps to have not only good gear but the right gear for the job.

 

[480sparky]

Of course we know technique is what matters. But it certainly helps to have not only good gear but the right gear for the job.

I guess anyone who doesn't own a D800E and a trinity will forever be relegated to being a rank amateur. Sorry, Canon. You lose, Pentax. Nice try, Olympus. Adios, Minolta. Tough luck Leica. Better luck next time, Sony. Why bother, Panasonic?


















Oh, and how does one put film into a D800E?

.

 

[deutsh]

Psssst! Your limited photographic and optical knowledge is showing!

My photographic knowledge is limited ?
Ok let me ask you: WHY 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 11.1x zoom is cost 650$.and 24-70mm f/2.8 3x zoom cost 2000$ WWWHHHYY. Why the D4 cost 6000$just the body .that first and second did your knowledge know there are a medium format cameras like hasslblad and its cost 20000$ just for body why . Ask any pro "why you use D3x ,D4, Mamya or hasslblad? Why you dont use The junk D7000 . He will tell you my knowlege is limited.

 

[o hey tyler]

My photographic knowledge is limited ?
Ok let me ask you: WHY 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 11.1x zoom is cost 650$.and 24-70mm f/2.8 3x zoom cost 2000$ WWWHHHYY. Why the D4 cost 6000$just the body .that first and second did your knowledge know there are a medium format cameras like hasslblad and its cost 20000$ just for body why . Ask any pro "why you use D3x ,D4, Mamya or hasslblad? Why you dont use The junk D7000 . He will tell you my knowlege is limited.

Because you think buying an expensive camera and expensive lenses makes you an instant pro. Coupled with the fact that you didn't seem to be aware that corner to corner sharpness was a property of the lens and not the body.

You realize that photography is mostly about talent and vision and not so much about getting "god mode" in terms of equipment, right? It doesn't seem like you do.

PS, yes my "knowledge knew" about digital medium format cameras and digital backs for film cameras. Lawl seriously bro?

 

[runnah]

Everyone knows the better the gear the better the photographer.

It's like science or something.

 

[o hey tyler]

Everyone knows the better the gear the better the photographer.

It's like science or something.

The last time I got involved with science, I was promised cake.

I never got the aforementioned cake. :-(

 

[480sparky]

.......... Why you dont use The junk D7000 .......

Would you care to tell me which of the images I've posted here were taken with a crappy D600, a POS D60 and a junk D7000?

BTW, where's all YOUR 'pro looking photos'?

 

[sandollars]

Psssst! Your limited photographic and optical knowledge is showing!

My photographic knowledge is limited ?
Ok let me ask you: WHY 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 11.1x zoom is cost 650$.and 24-70mm f/2.8 3x zoom cost 2000$ WWWHHHYY. Why the D4 cost 6000$just the body .that first and second did your knowledge know there are a medium format cameras like hasslblad and its cost 20000$ just for body why . Ask any pro "why you use D3x ,D4, Mamya or hasslblad? Why you dont use The junk D7000 . He will tell you my knowlege is limited.

Wow, Don't look now but your ignorance needs to be tucked in before you trip on it and hurt yourself... :Joker:

A D7000 is far from junk... Some of my best shots came out of that body.. In fact, I won 10 grand on a seascape photo taken with a D7000 and a Nikkor 18-200 DX. No FX and no trinity involved. Anyone who calls a D7000 junk is just simply being an elitist. Of course, this is just MHO...

 

[manicmike]

.If you have them all you are the winner ....belive me.
.[/QUOTE]


Winner of what? I am not following. What will I win?[/QUOTE]

The internet sir. That's what you win.

 

[PropilotBW]

.If you have them all you are the winner ....belive me.
.

Winner of what? I am not following. What will I win?[/QUOTE]

Winner of the ultimate sharp pro looking photos with(sharp in center and edge ,no distortion ,in low light satuation you can take photos,and various lenses between ultra wide ,standard and zoom) If he get (nikon D800E+12-24 mm f/2.8,24-70mm f/2.8,70-200mm f/2.8) and them all are cost 7000$.and that is all.[/QUOTE]

Well, not all of us have oil money.
You look at any Pro's bag. I guarantee their other camera is a D7000 or equivalent Canon model.

 

[deutsh]

Because you think buying an expensive camera and expensive lenses makes you an instant pro. Coupled with the fact that you didn't seem to be aware that corner to corner sharpness was a property of the lens and not the body.

You realize that photography is mostly about talent and vision and not so much about getting "god mode" in terms of equipment, right? It doesn't seem like you do.

PS, yes my "knowledge knew" about digital medium format cameras and digital backs for film cameras. Lawl seriously bro?

I know the skill play great part in any proficiency.but the great equi.can help the professionals to get no limits.
And one of my life rules is "The Expensive thinks mean great beneft" .