***NSFW*** Not safe for Wife*** C&C GOOD, BAD, or UGLY?

[Trever1t]

Trying new things in my processing.

_POR3535-Edit by WSG Photography, on Flickr

Re-touched with your suggestions!
_POR3535-Edit-2 by WSG Photography, on Flickr

 

[Designer]

Not well educated on the processing, but I really like where you put your logo!

 

[bribrius]

same here on lacking processing. I did notice im looking at her azz and Im wondering if he did that so I cant pick on her makeup. Not that im complaining...


edit: oh.. Good. I like the direction you are going here. Like the pose and background change.

 

[astroNikon]

Trying new things in my processing.

getting sexier models & poses doesn't quite count as "new things in your processing"

 

[astroNikon]

this is one of those photos that can only get better if there's a chair in front of her, and she's bent over to the chair, glancing back to the camera licking her lips with bright red lip gloss on ...

wait ...
did I type that ?

 

[bribrius]

Trying new things in my processing.

getting sexier models & poses doesn't quite count as "new things in your processing"

she has a wedgie. Isn't that at least something to do with a composition change? I don't think ALL his models had a wedgie.

 

[Trever1t]

Guys, this is a photo forum and I asked for C&C not immature banter on my images. If you continue I will cease to post here due to the lack of consideration to me as artist and my model, who is a really nice young student who permitted me to photograph her.

 

[IzzieK]

Here is a serious one from me -- I think her legs and arms are a bit overprocessed. It was the first thing I noticed in the shot. Is this a composite? Just asking...the arms and the legs are almost the same colour processed, smoothed out too much that it looks too unnatural to my taste. Beautiful body, beautiful lady, sharp, nice composition all that -- but it looks almost like those Pixar Studio skin look-alike. Just my honest opinion.

 

[D-B-J]

For me, it seems like there's a halo or some softness around her edges, particularly around the edges of the socks. And a large soft spot on her left arm near the top, but the hand/wrist seems to be in focus. Could you post what a photo of how you used to process, so we can see what the new "changes" are?

Cheers!
Jake

 

[Trever1t]

Ya, there may be some artifacts from my brush work. I was going for an airbrushed look. Not a composite but I did selective light manipulations. There is another post down a bit in the General gallery of this same girl.

 

[NikonO4K]

I am not a professional anything so take this with a grain of salt. The first thing I noticed and consequently the only thing that grabs my attention is the dark patch on her right shoulder. It just looks wrong.

 

[wyogirl]

Its obvious that she is airbrushed but I think that style has a place in the type of photos that you take. I like it.

 

[runnah]

Skin processing is a bit plastic looking, maybe 10% less the what you have now.

Other than that I think you have a well shot photo.

 

[DarkShadow]

Gorgeous model as always. Some Niggles I have on this one.
1 I hate the high socks and actually think it would be better with no socks at all.
2 I wish she was a few steps to right to block some of that outside beyond the arch.Green tree leaves etc.
3 Skin does look to smoothed over I think.
4 Not crazy for the location of the shoot.
5 I Like the pose with the hand on her head.
6 Love the placement of the water mark.
7 Nice lighting on her.

 

[FITBMX]

Guys, this is a photo forum and I asked for C&C not immature banter on my images. If you continue I will cease to post here due to the lack of consideration to me as artist and my model, who is a really nice young student who permitted me to photograph her.

Looks a little to animated for me, but everything else is great! But I'm new.

P.S.
never stop posting your photos! They are wonderful and inspiring!!!:hail: