The "Galleries" area is probably a better spot to request comments. I'd put this in the "Landscapes & Cityscapes" gallery.
As for comments... you're dealing with some dynamic range problems. You probably want the lights to have a pleasant glow... but they're really blown out. The clock-face is a bit of a dominant feature, but it's heavily blown out. You're also having some depth of field issues. The exposure needs to be reduced. Unfortunately when you reduce the exposure to get the lights correct, the darker areas will drop to the shadows even more. This would be a good candidate for HDR (not the cheesy surrealistic HDRs... a pleasant natural HDR.)
Mostly what your images are featuring are distant objects, but they are soft. Image 1 has the bridge railing in the foreground, but it slashes indiscriminately through the image and isn't really a feature of the image.
Looking at the EXIF data, I see you took this at f/8 at 18mm -- but it appears you focused on the bridge railing which just a few feet away. Let's call that 5' (I have no idea how far it really is). Your DoF would only be about 16' feet (far limit would be about 20'). That's not enough to get the background focused.
When you're taking these cityscapes, no need to rush through it... think carefully about depth of field selection. At f/11, the DoF "far limit" would have jumped to infinity.
On the next shot ... clock tower as seen down the length of the bridge ... you did jump up to f/11 and the focus on the background is improved. It's still a little soft, but much better than the first shot.
Shot #3 provides what I think is the best focus on the background out of the three... but it is overexposed -- so we're still losing a lot of detail in the clock-face.
