Well for one, if you are in the business of photography you should have insurance including liability insurance. The insurance companies like to have lawyers involved where they may be called upon to fork over money on a claim. Liabiality insurance doesn't just cover some one just tripping over your gear and getting hurt. Also depending on the size of the claim it may not qualify for small claims court. Emotional distress, Yada, Yada, Yada...can get quite expensive in the claim. Doesn't mean they will win but they can sure claim it if they like.Why get lawyer involved? Isn't a small claims court easier, providing the married couple haven't started formal litigation? I am not a legal person but more curious as to why no one seems this is a viable alternative for the photographer?