Post your favorite shot from your most recent roll

[SoulfulRecover]

 

[jcdeboever]

dude, that is fantastic. youre awesome.

 

[SoulfulRecover]

dude, that is fantastic. youre awesome.

Thanks! I was surprised it came out honestly. It was a 1 sec exposure but the kiddo did a good job of not moving

 

[Peeb]

Nikon F100
Nikkor 35-105 macro
Fujifilm
Processed by thedarkroom.com
Post in Photoshop
October 2017


F100-Oct2017 by Peeb-OK, on Flickr

 

[Peeb]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

 

[jcdeboever]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

I know you didn't ask me. However, I have then shooting mostly sunny 16, even with a metered camera. I still Journal but I can pretty much visualize the settings by looking at the image once it's processed. I don't know if that's an individual thing but after logging in a journal for a while, I seem to be spot on at guessing what my aperture and shutter speed were based on the scene. Do I recommend this? Not necessarily, but it seems to work for me. So much so, I've Incorporated it somewhat in my digital shooting as well. Additionally, I would venture to say that in portraiture this would not apply

 

[Peeb]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

I know you didn't ask me. However, I have then shooting mostly sunny 16, even with a metered camera. I still Journal but I can pretty much visualize the settings by looking at the image once it's processed. I don't know if that's an individual thing but after logging in a journal for a while, I seem to be spot on at guessing what my aperture and shutter speed were based on the scene. Do I recommend this? Not necessarily, but it seems to work for me. So much so, I've Incorporated it somewhat in my digital shooting as well. Additionally, I would venture to say that in portraiture this would not apply

Wow! To me that is akin to perfect pitch in music: it can be learned to an extent but some are just 'naturals'. Amazing.

 

[jcdeboever]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

I know you didn't ask me. However, I have then shooting mostly sunny 16, even with a metered camera. I still Journal but I can pretty much visualize the settings by looking at the image once it's processed. I don't know if that's an individual thing but after logging in a journal for a while, I seem to be spot on at guessing what my aperture and shutter speed were based on the scene. Do I recommend this? Not necessarily, but it seems to work for me. So much so, I've Incorporated it somewhat in my digital shooting as well. Additionally, I would venture to say that in portraiture this would not apply

Wow! To me that is akin to perfect pitch in music: it can be learned to an extent but some are just 'naturals'. Amazing.

So the F100 doesn't have the ability to imprint the settings on the negative?

 

[Gary A.]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

I know you didn't ask me. However, I have then shooting mostly sunny 16, even with a metered camera. I still Journal but I can pretty much visualize the settings by looking at the image once it's processed. I don't know if that's an individual thing but after logging in a journal for a while, I seem to be spot on at guessing what my aperture and shutter speed were based on the scene. Do I recommend this? Not necessarily, but it seems to work for me. So much so, I've Incorporated it somewhat in my digital shooting as well. Additionally, I would venture to say that in portraiture this would not apply

I can look at my old pixs and call out lens and settings. (But then who knows if I'm wrong?)

 

[jcdeboever]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

I know you didn't ask me. However, I have then shooting mostly sunny 16, even with a metered camera. I still Journal but I can pretty much visualize the settings by looking at the image once it's processed. I don't know if that's an individual thing but after logging in a journal for a while, I seem to be spot on at guessing what my aperture and shutter speed were based on the scene. Do I recommend this? Not necessarily, but it seems to work for me. So much so, I've Incorporated it somewhat in my digital shooting as well. Additionally, I would venture to say that in portraiture this would not apply

I can look at my old pixs and call out lens and settings. (But then who knows if I'm wrong?)

Right.

 

[Vtec44]

Portra 400, push 1 stop in development, 67 90 f2.8 on Pentax 645nii

View attachment 152122

Do you keep a notebook or journal or something to record your settings? I really miss EXIF when shooting film.

The Pentax have data imprinting on the negatives so I don't have to write it down but I do write down the info for each roll of film and scan it into the same folder as the scanned images. I shoot mostly 3 film stocks (Portra 160, 400, 800) so I kind of know everything by heart.

 

[Peeb]

Nikon F100 and nikor 200-500 (don't recall if 1.4x teleconverter or not). Cropped and tweaked in DXO and photoshop

Moon captured on film by Peeb-OK, on Flickr

 

[Peeb]

Up the flag pole by Peeb-OK, on Flickr

 

[SoulfulRecover]

My wife would kill me for posting this (she doesn't like the way she looks) but I think its cute. Quick phone photo of the neg and invert. Probably wont ever get it scanned

 

[jcdeboever]

My wife would kill me for posting this (she doesn't like the way she looks) but I think its cute. Quick phone photo of the neg and invert. Probably wont ever get it scanned

View attachment 152538

Beautiful . She should be proud, just a wonderful image.