wow. just realized you dug this one up. how deep did you have to go for this one, Mark? musta been a buncha pages!
i have changed so much since i first posted this. you have given me pause to reflect...
when i wrote this, i was thinkin' i was more of an artist, still had quite alot of the science to learn. these days, i know how much i really have to learn. kinda like knowing better how very little i do know. does that make sense to anyone? :scratch:
these days, i feel like i have stalled. i still learn alot every day, especially by interacting with people like all you guys. but i am beginning to feel like i am not so latently talented, after all. i'm struggling with this one at the moment.
it's ironic, you know, because it is this very feeling to which i began to allude in the infamous "critique" thread that sorta sent it off on a tangent.
i had said that i thought the quality of photos on this forum had increased lately. i still believe that- some real talent on here. i can sit and talk all day about what is good and what is bad about these photos, and sound relatively educated about it, but i can not, to my satisfaction, match their quality- their "punch," if you will. so, in a way, i have had kind of a humbling experience here lately, and now i'm not sure whether i should claim either scientist or artist!
not to worry, i'm sure i'll shake it off. and dissatisfaction with one's own work has always been a good catalyst, no?