I am the first one to admit that it can be fun to play with things like redscale film or plastic lenses, and I am certainly ready to defend imperfections in an image, but dear lord, this exhausts me.
When something happens organically, it's a happy accident and that's fine. I'll never be able to recreate the following image, and quite frankly, I don't want to, even if I quite like it. If I learn to recreate this reliably, it becomes a gimmick and that's when my photography becomes trite and boring (if it hasn't already

).

Day 26 - Diner by
limrodrigues, on Flickr
Even when one purposely uses a technique to create a certain kind of imperfection, I'm good with that. It means that there is a specific purpose and intention for adding an imperfection; it is done deliberately to add to the artistic vision. This means that the person actually
has a vision. Not all shots are "Holga shots" or "instant shots" but sometimes, you'll see a scene and the
feel of the image that you have in your head can only be captured if you have the softer plastic lens or the paticular color variations of an instant emulsion.

Riverside by
limrodrigues, on Flickr

rAloe throws shade by
limrodrigues, on Flickr
But the whole artifice of imperfection for its own sake is tiresome, and it also gives film shooters like me a bad name. And that annoys me.