What's new

She's a natural!

yeah, I'm an idiot. Thinking of something else. :)

I didn't call you an idiot! (but I won't disagree with you!) lol! :) (j/k)!

You were probably thinking of the PBJ lens.. that you can get in either chunky or smooth.. and strawberry or grape! :P
 
Edited OP with a new picture. Thought it would be silly to start a new thread on the same topic, so here it is. Let me know what you think! :thumbup:
 
I don't love the vignetting and the arm chop is distracting. Prefer the lens flare personally :D
 
At first glance, the new one is better because she is attractive but:

Her face and torso are badly underexposed
she is OOF
her elbow is brightly lit and draws the eye
The background has lots of stuff in it

She's pretty but you need to pay more attention to exposing and focising on the important areas.

Lew
 
Ok I did a super quick play, its not perfect because of the quality but I thought I'd post anyway :)
I'd also clone out some of the stuff in the background (or just get her to model for you another time!) I did a channel/curves thing, a couple selective color pulls, a photo filter and a brightness bump.
6686705249_081ec6d8d7_bcopy.jpg
 
Hey Guys, Thanks for the input!
Personally I love the vignetting. haha! but that's just me. I would love to try again with this little shoot we did. I attempted to do some cloning, and was succesful in removing the light switch that was visable in the original picture, but the bigger stuff was very very difficult to clone out and keep it looking natural.

Bossy, I don't particularly like your edit. NO OFFENSE :mrgreen:. It is just crazy over exposed now! haha
I agree though the original picture is underexposed and slightly soft on the focus, but I tend to like pictures that are slightly underexposed than those that are overexposed. I do apreciate you taking the time to give me some critiques and especially trying to edit my picture! :thumbup::thumbup::D
 
Hah thats funny, it still looks a shade dark to me in her face! Her shirt is def a mess, but thats from working a small image more than anything. No prob though!
 
....but I tend to like pictures that are slightly underexposed than those that are overexposed. :thumbup::thumbup::D

I would be willing to bet (a little) that what you like are deeply saturated middle tones rather than underexposed pictures )which are underexposed everywhere and generally look sort of foggy and flat.)
There is a PS method for creating that deeply saturated look but it requires a well exposed image with lots of detail in the middle tones.
 
I would be willing to bet (a little) that what you like are deeply saturated middle tones rather than underexposed pictures )which are underexposed everywhere and generally look sort of foggy and flat.)
There is a PS method for creating that deeply saturated look but it requires a well exposed image with lots of detail in the middle tones.

I'm not going to pretend like I know exactly what you are talking about, but I'm going to look into that. I'm sure you are correct though. :mrgreen:
 
Yes fill flash. Cute though.

Yeah, she's a looker alright!
I hate the pop up flash :grumpy:
I'm looking into buying an external flash with a diffuser, can't wait! :thumbup::thumbup:
 
I would be willing to bet (a little) that what you like are deeply saturated middle tones rather than underexposed pictures )which are underexposed everywhere and generally look sort of foggy and flat.)
There is a PS method for creating that deeply saturated look but it requires a well exposed image with lots of detail in the middle tones.

I'm not going to pretend like I know exactly what you are talking about, but I'm going to look into that. I'm sure you are correct though. :mrgreen:


HAhaha I was just googling the same thing. Traveler, can you link to something to show the style you're talking about?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom