sony a77

[kassad]

For the love of all that is good and holy, please let this d@mn thread die.

 

[skieur]

Canon 7D vs Sony SLT A77

A77 destroy the Canon 7D

Canon 7D vs Sony A77 – Camera Comparison

A77 destroy the Canon 7D again

Welcome to Flickr!

Studio Shot sample of a77 vs the Canon 7D. A77 once again destroy the 7D

You can call the a77 "suck, bad camera, noisy," etc. you cannot change the fact that it is better than most camera on the market.

Ummm, yeah. I don't think destroy is the right word. Most of the features that push the A77 ahead in those "comparisons" are options that pros do not use. You know, those "toy" features.

Also its sad when someone says this camera is better than most on the current market, considering this is one of sony's newer releases, and everyone keeps comparing it to bodies who's successors are on the way. Sad.

Not knocking sony, just the fanboy's.

Gee, when you don't like the info. provided by argiermos, you make up your own spin, eh Jake? Jumping on the bandwagon of another post you echo the stupidity about so called "toy features" Of course you would NOT know whether pros use them or not. Let me assure you that they do.
Virtual tours are common in the real estate sold in Canada when large houses and properties are involved. In camera panoramas, simulated tilt shift, and in camera HDRs are widely used by pros in this field. I have also seen in camera panoramas on the front of magazines too. So quit the stupid, inaccurate spin.

I said that the Sony A77 was equal to the Canon and Nikon cameras I mentioned, and it is SILLY of you to argue about present versus POTENTIAL new releases. Sure the Nikon D8000 will come out with 36 megapixels, but then later the Sony A99 will come out as well with the same sensor.
Meanwhile Canon will come out with a new release as well.

What is sad is your silly spin and excuses!!!

skieur

 

[argieramos]

In the side-by-side shootout between the Nikon D7000 and the Sony A77, they specifically mention that BOTH CAMERAS are using KIT LENSES. So, the footing is equal, kit lens vs kit lens.The Sony quickly burns through its buffer, then drops to around "less than one frame per second", and the Sony suffers from erratic light metering. The Nikon D7000 has excellent light metering throughout the entire sequence, and drops to around 2 frames per second after its buffer has been filled.

Nikon's in-camera light and flash metering technology and intellectual property is second to none. Nikon invented "matrix" metering and the use of computer chips and analysis of scenes compared against actual photographs stored in the computer's memory. Nikon "invented" Red-Green-Blue "color-aware" light metering. Nikon "invented" the use of subject color measurement and analysis paired with Autofocus, with both user-selected start points, and with the automated Scene Recognition System. Nikon has been making "professional" cameras since before the Korean War....that is decidedly not the case with Sony. Nikon cameras have been aboard every single US space mission,spanning from the 1960's to the 2010's.

There's very little doubt as to why a cheap Nikon with a cheap kit lens can out-meter, and out-focus a Sony camera. Only within the last year and a half has Canon figured out a method to get around Nikon's patented RGB color-aware metering and focusing; Canon did it by adding a FOURTH color to analyze!!! Yellow-Green!!! Which incidentally,is something the Japanese people and the Japanese language actually take note of: how much yellow there is in the greens!

So yeah, argie, I am aware, fully aware, that BOTH cameras used kit lenses in the test. And the Nikon was the better performer.

lol Kai was not using kit lens on D7000 on the first round you f0o! Can't you tell based on the form factor of the lens? A Honda Civic will be able to out-run a Mustang that has Government speed limiter.
So much for the so-called accomplished photographer. Kai then used the kit lens on the D7000 after the first round. You really didn't pay attention to the video.
What's up with this Nikon invented blah blah blah? If Nikon invented something, that's great! Good for them.. But this thread is not about the brand. You don't see me bragging about how the exposure metering of "Nikon"D80 inferior to the "Sony"a100 based on the digitalcamerainfo test. You can shave your butt with that fanboyism attitude of yours. I like Nikon actually, more than Canon. But man, the fact is they wouldn't be able to even get close to Canon if it wasn't for the help of third parties like, uhhmm... Sony? 80% of Nikon DSLR uses Sony sensor.

Re-watch the video, aight?

 

[argieramos]

I didn't see any advantages, Sony don't tell you the A55 is not for studio people have to find out after buying it, i did a serch after using one

You didn't see the advantages because you haven't tried the a77. We are talking about the a77 here boy. Man, you should have known that the a55 is an entry level DSLT. Were you expecting a lot from a camera on that level?

 

[argieramos]

you're hopeless.

look who's talking lol

 

[Omofo]

The Sony quickly burns through its buffer, then drops to around "less than one frame per second", and the Sony suffers from erratic light metering. The Nikon D7000 has excellent light metering throughout the entire sequence, and drops to around 2 frames per second after its buffer has been filled.

The Sony is shooting at twice the fps, so it stands to reason that the buffer is going to fill faster...

Yes,and while the buffer is full, the Nikon is shooting twice as fast with its filled buffer! Meaning the Sony's huge 24 megapixel files are a PITA to write to card!!!

But what explains the sucky light-metering from the Sony? Inferior technology I guess one might say...

Agreed, but if sony can supply Nikon with sensors then Nikon should do them a solid in return...

 

[unpopular]

No. Seriously. You have NO IDEA what you are talking about. I may be wrong about certain aspects of what I've said, whatever. You though are completely clueless.

You have demonstrated on several occasions that you really have no notion of the most basic principles of photography. What's worse is that you have embarrassed yourself on several occasions not only according to me, but almost anyone else who has happened upon what you've said - and not only regarding this topic, but also photography as a whole.

Just because your aunt paid you $35 to take some photos at her wedding doesn't make you a pro. Just because you took some smutty pictures of your sister on your ipod doesn't make you some kind of expert. While you have made a valid point or two, you have demonstrated over and over and over that you don't have ANY IDEA what you are doing.

The SLT fanboyism and insistence that I am absolutely opposed to the technology under any implementation is annoying enough. But then you go around as a charlatan with way more experience and knowledge than you you do, which just makes you

an obnoxious little boy

 

[Nikon_Josh]

No. Seriously. You have NO IDEA what you are talking about. I may be wrong about certain aspects of what I've said, whatever. You though are completely clueless.

You have demonstrated on several occasions that you really have no notion of the most basic principles of photography. What's worse is that you have embarrassed yourself on several occasions not only according to me, but almost anyone else who has happened upon what you've said - and not only regarding this topic, but also photography as a whole.

Just because your aunt paid you $35 to take some photos at her wedding doesn't make you a pro. Just because you took some smutty pictures of your sister on your ipod doesn't make you some kind of expert. While you have made a valid point or two, you have demonstrated over and over and over that you don't have ANY IDEA what you are doing.

The SLT fanboyism and insistence that I am absolutely opposed to the technology under any implementation is annoying enough. But then you go around as a charlatan with way more experience and knowledge than you think you do just makes you

an obnoxious little boy

Err unpopular your wrong! He knows how to edit photos on iphone apps? Who else can do that? So credit where credit is due!

 

[Omofo]

Must I repeat "the evf on the A77 has a refresh rate of 60Hz". End of discussion.

maybe. but look at my reply the first time your brought this up.

Ahh, yes frame rate and refresh aren't always the same.

 

[Nikon_Josh]

Canon 7D vs Sony SLT A77

A77 destroy the Canon 7D

Canon 7D vs Sony A77 – Camera Comparison

A77 destroy the Canon 7D again

Welcome to Flickr!

Studio Shot sample of a77 vs the Canon 7D. A77 once again destroy the 7D

You can call the a77 "suck, bad camera, noisy," etc. you cannot change the fact that it is better than most camera on the market.

Ummm, yeah. I don't think destroy is the right word. Most of the features that push the A77 ahead in those "comparisons" are options that pros do not use. You know, those "toy" features.

Also its sad when someone says this camera is better than most on the current market, considering this is one of sony's newer releases, and everyone keeps comparing it to bodies who's successors are on the way. Sad.

Not knocking sony, just the fanboy's.

Gee, when you don't like the info. provided by argiermos, you make up your own spin, eh Jake? Jumping on the bandwagon of another post you echo the stupidity about so called "toy features" Of course you would NOT know whether pros use them or not. Let me assure you that they do.
Virtual tours are common in the real estate sold in Canada when large houses and properties are involved. In camera panoramas, simulated tilt shift, and in camera HDRs are widely used by pros in this field. I have also seen in camera panoramas on the front of magazines too. So quit the stupid, inaccurate spin.

I said that the Sony A77 was equal to the Canon and Nikon cameras I mentioned, and it is SILLY of you to argue about present versus POTENTIAL new releases. Sure the Nikon D8000 will come out with 36 megapixels, but then later the Sony A99 will come out as well with the same sensor.
Meanwhile Canon will come out with a new release as well.

What is sad is your silly spin and excuses!!!

skieur

skieur calling others people on this forum stupid??? :lmao: You may be ''intelligent'' skieur, but your career is a fantasy...

Accusations of spin? Coming from the king of spin, spin, spin

 

[unpopular]

Err unpopular your wrong! He knows how to edit photos on iphone apps? Who else can do that? So credit where credit is due!

you are absolutely right. I don't have ten bucks to waste on silly apps for the iPad.

 

[o hey tyler]

Err unpopular your wrong! He knows how to edit photos on iphone apps? Who else can do that? So credit where credit is due!

you are absolutely right. I don't have ten bucks to waste on silly apps for the iPad.

You would, if you bought an A77 over a 1D Mk IV.

 

[argieramos]

No. Seriously. You have NO IDEA what you are talking about. I may be wrong about certain aspects of what I've said, whatever. You though are completely clueless.

You have demonstrated on several occasions that you really have no notion of the most basic principles of photography. What's worse is that you have embarrassed yourself on several occasions not only according to me, but almost anyone else who has happened upon what you've said - and not only regarding this topic, but also photography as a whole.

Just because your aunt paid you $35 to take some photos at her wedding doesn't make you a pro. Just because you took some smutty pictures of your sister on your ipod doesn't make you some kind of expert. While you have made a valid point or two, you have demonstrated over and over and over that you don't have ANY IDEA what you are doing.

The SLT fanboyism and insistence that I am absolutely opposed to the technology under any implementation is annoying enough. But then you go around as a charlatan with way more experience and knowledge than you you do, which just makes you

an obnoxious little boy

Wow! I dare you to make a summary of which things do you think I am clueless about.

If you really know better than I do, minor issue wouldn't be such a big problem to you. "I dont use noise reduction, they suck" Yea, you know a lot. Noise reduction is powerful tool mind you.

If you really know better, you wouldn't even dare to question the ability of EVF to follow a high speed plane with close magnification due to the fact that your human reflexes won't even be able to keep up even if you use OVF

If you really know better, you wouldn't just see the drawbacks of EVF, but also the advantages it will give you.Some people don't like EVF, but some do. Some people like to look the beauty and realism through the OVF, some people like to see the histogram, settings, the preview of the exposure even before they make a shot through the EVF. It's just a matter of opinion which you can't understand.

If you really know better, you wouldn't use the term "SLT fanboyism" on me. I never say SLT technology is better than SLR, but that depends on the eyes of a certain photographers.

I am not a fanboy. You just love to hate things.

 

[gsgary]

I didn't see any advantages, Sony don't tell you the A55 is not for studio people have to find out after buying it, i did a serch after using one

You didn't see the advantages because you haven't tried the a77. We are talking about the a77 here boy. Man, you should have known that the a55 is an entry level DSLT. Were you expecting a lot from a camera on that level?

I have use an A77 and i can't see any pro buying one

 

[argieramos]

Err unpopular your wrong! He knows how to edit photos on iphone apps? Who else can do that? So credit where credit is due!

you are absolutely right. I don't have ten bucks to waste on silly apps for the iPad.

Another hate statement coming from a person who only know to hate things. As expected