Designer
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2012
- Messages
- 18,505
- Reaction score
- 4,853
- Location
- Iowa
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
The ball of flame and smoke in #3 is coming out from around the primer. In this type of rifle, (muzzleloader) the rifleman places a small primer cup over the nipple which is connected to the main charge in the barrel. When the hammer falls, it ignites the primer charge, which sends flame into the barrel, igniting the main charge. (yes, there is a noticeable delay as all this occurs)Forgive me as I am ignorant of how a gun blast looks in real life, but there's something about the one in #2 that looks kind of fake. Edges seem way too clean. That might just be how they look, I don't know. All I have to go on is what I see in the picture.
So, do re-enacters ever play "what if?" and re-write history or do they stay faithful to historical facts?
EDIT: Damn, I didn't notice until just now that I meant to write #3, not #2.
The charge in those rifles is black powder which produces a lot of smoke. Modern smokeless powders were developed in part to minimize the smoke produced.
