analog.universe
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2011
- Messages
- 1,923
- Reaction score
- 330
- Location
- Vermont
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
But in a practical IQ sense, does a $300 manfrotto setup result in a less sharp image than a $1000 gitzo? The weight and features of my tripod do not bother me (probably because I've not had anything better). I'm quite happy with it. I am, however, very concerned with getting the absolute sharpest image.
There are probably more variables involved in answering that...
I would guess that with certain lenses, at certain shutter speeds, in certain climates, there will probably be no difference at all. But if for some reason you're shooting at like 1/2sec with a 300mm lens in the wind, you may notice that the Gitzo serves you a little better. I'm just speculating though, I don't really know about your manfrotto setup, maybe you'll never notice a difference, maybe you can a see a difference at 1/60 85mm in the studio.
With any pro gear, the price goes up a lot faster than the performance does. So the difference between $200 and $300 for a tripod is probably more than the difference between $300 and $800.
Are there any images you've shot with your setup that you feel are not as sharp as they could be? If you're not running into any problems then it's probably not worth worrying about the differences...