What's new

The changing field of professional cameras

D4 was just released

/Thread

The D8000 will be more interesting with the Sony 36 megapixel chip, probably in February. Sony is still making decisions on the specs for the A99 and it is not expected until April.

skieur
 
Yea, everybody knows that more pixels is always better... regardless of the drawbacks and consequences.
 
Yea, everybody knows that more pixels is always better... regardless of the drawbacks and consequences.

With design changes more pixels can be better and they are changing the design.

skieur
 
Yea, everybody knows that more pixels is always better... regardless of the drawbacks and consequences.

With design changes more pixels can be better and they are changing the design.

skieur

That's nice and all but the sensor is only half the equation. You can have a super high res sensor with the best specs imaginable but unless you've got glass in front of it that is capable of resolving those smaller spots and preserving the contrast... who cares?
 
I don't know much about Sony glass but aren't Zeiss lenses supposed to be good?
 
I don't know much about Sony glass but aren't Zeiss lenses supposed to be good?

Yeah, just like Pizza is supposed to be a vegetable.
 
The majority of "Zeiss" glass these days...isn't it made by Cosina? I mean, the last I heard, the ZF and ZE series (for Nikon F and Canon EF) manual focusing Zeiss lenses, as well as the newer series for Pentax K-mount, were ALL being made by Cosina, for "Zeiss". Zeiss these days is really just a name...just as the modern Contax cameras of the 1980's were made by Yashica, and then later by Kyocera. The "Contax" brand of cameras, and their associated lenses, have really been "Yashica" or "Kyocera" since the late 1970's, when the Contax name was bought, and resurrected.

Same with the Voigtlander 35mm rangefinders; Cosina bought the rights to the old Voigtlander name over a decade ago, and began producing. As far as Zeiss lenses...they have some nice lenses, as well as some that look horrible...the 50mm f/1.4 Planar for example--UGLY bokeh...simply horrific....God-awful. Hashy. Harsh. Yeeech! What is really sad is that one of the absolute best lenses Cosina ever made, the 125mm Apo-Lanthar, was discontinued at the insistence of Zeiss, in order to get the production contract for lenses branded Zeiss...since the APO-Lanthar was NOT of Zeiss origins, and was one of the absolute best-corrected macro lenses, Zeiss forced Cosina to stop production of a lens that would have made their offerings look like dogmeat by comparison.

Zeiss aka Cosina has made some pretty well-proved manual focusing lenses for 35mm cameras over the last few years, but their autofocusing stuff is kind of a mystery to me. I'm not really sure what they have in the AF ranks.
 
I doesn't matter who ... oh f*ck it already.

I'm done. :)
 
I don't know much about Sony glass but aren't Zeiss lenses supposed to be good?

Yes, Leica and Zeiss have the best reputation for lenses.

skieur
 
Rolls-Royce quality - Made by Kia

Tiffany & Co. Quality - Made by WalMart

Kentucky Fried Chicken Quality - Made by Bubba's Chik-N-Shak

Yeah...we get it...
 
Yea, everybody knows that more pixels is always better... regardless of the drawbacks and consequences.

With design changes more pixels can be better and they are changing the design.

skieur

That's nice and all but the sensor is only half the equation. You can have a super high res sensor with the best specs imaginable but unless you've got glass in front of it that is capable of resolving those smaller spots and preserving the contrast... who cares?

Yes, and the Zeiss, Sony G lenses, and Minolta lenses do that.

skieur
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom