By the way, this is not a ‘big picture’ discussion. I narrowly defined my remarks to hotel room dog premium. Not a general discussion of service dog misrepsentation. Regardless of your pivots and attempting to take the discussion to places the original statement didn’t go to or represent ... you are still wrong and I still resent you alluding that I am “slimy” for accepting a discount offered by the hotel.
I'm sorry Gary, I was not referring to you as slimy (as I did not think you would actually do this) - rather that the action was. Again, I beg to differ - this is a small aspect of a very big picture. While the laws are likely different in California, in BC that would actually constitute a criminal offense.
I am very sorry if I've offended; this is a topic fairly close to me, and I have seen the problems arising from misrepresentation of service dogs, so any evidence of it tends to bother me. I understand that this is in the class of offenses that most people believe don't matter; pushing the speed limit a bit, parking in a 'No Parking' area, inflating costs on an insurance claim, etc, but the truth is, these do have an effect, and while usually small, not readily apparent, it is there.
Again, I am sorry for having caused offense!