What's new

The people

I think that burning in the blinding spot on her front and cropping from either side would increase the impact of this picture.
 
What vintage is this supposed to be, and what are all of the white lines supposed to represent?

They are the tracks of stray alpha-speedotron particles that were emitted when the planet Kodalure exploded in 1623. This allows us to date the picture to 1541.
 
What vintage is this supposed to be, and what are all of the white lines supposed to represent?

They are the tracks of stray alpha-speedotron particles that were emitted when the planet Kodalure exploded in 1623. This allows us to date the picture to 1541.

I must admit... I lol'd a bit. Actually, quite a lot.. :)
 
What vintage is this supposed to be, and what are all of the white lines supposed to represent?

They are the tracks of stray alpha-speedotron particles that were emitted when the planet Kodalure exploded in 1623. This allows us to date the picture to 1541.

I just knew it was something really technical like that.
 
Seriously, though, I like this photo. The "vintage" lines look gimmicky, the heads on the tee-shirt distract, the hipster glasses are kind of "meh..," and the horizon is tilted, but otherwise, I really like it. Especially her hair(!!!) and the carefree feeling of sun and beach. Can you possibly post the original or a less-processed version?
 
What vintage is this supposed to be, and what are all of the white lines supposed to represent?

Thats the old photo that your kid pulled out of the album and then scrapped across the floor. To me vintage bw needs more of the silvery Kodak feel or a sepia tone. Only thing I really dont like is that the horizon line is crooked and close to the middle of the image.
 
They are the tracks of stray alpha-speedotron particles that were emitted when the planet Kodalure exploded in 1623. This allows us to date the picture to 1541.

Thanks Helen. Now I have to go and wash out my desk and computer. :lmao:
 
Now, the more serious response.

It looks ridiculous.

I don't have a problem with the vintage look, I think some family negatives from 30 years ago could actually yield a print "somewhat" like this. "Somewhat" because it is a bit overdone. Anyway, the problem is that the contents don't match the vintage look and that looks stupid to me.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom