Thanks...pls update the polls too ya.
In flickr it looks underexposed. Here it's better, I mean on my screen it is still OK.:hug::
So I think it's not a screen calibration issue anymore.
it looks a tad underexposed. i was hesitant at first to say that because i was using a monitor that is somewhat dark, but i saw it on my laptop screen, which is rather bright, and it still looked underexposed.
It seems like the land part is a bit underexposed due to the brightness of the sky on the right, which is what you would normally get. As I tend to like pics a tad darker (to me colours seem to show better when just a little darker), I don't mind the underexposure too much. Though if this were mine, I'd throw a well-feathered lasso around the land and see what auto contrast would bring - or adjust it manually, depends...
On my husband's laptop screen it'd surely look waaay too dark at the bottom, his screen is MUCH darker than the one of my desktop!
This is the kind of post that would definitely benefit from HDR photography. It's a bit underexposed for the trees and land, but any more exposure would blow out the sky.
If you can get a CPL you'd be set here...otherwise either try an HDR or up the exposure and then in PP add contrast and possibly darken the sky slightly.