I think what makes modern digital cameras so cool is how much dynamic range is present in the files. I've found through trial and error that it's much easier to expose for the highlights, which leaves images looking like this one straight out of the camera. I was able to pull an enormous amount of detail out of one file. The final edited version had some exposure work done in LR (-70 on Highlights and +100 on the shadows), and then I sent it out to PS to run some contrast filters in CFXP4. I also used the healing brush to take out the D600 sensor splooge in the upper left hand corner of the screen.
The only problem is that with my manual focus lens, it being dark, and my in-camera file being very dark -- I missed the foreground focus. That's part of the learning curve with this lens I guess. It has everything I need to focus by distance and aperture, and I need to get comfortable with that method.
I agree. For this, I wasn't worried about that, and I also didn't cook it as hard as some others might. I did set a black point for the file, so there are some places that are absolute black. That being said...I understand why some people might shy away from photos that have more range that our eyes would have in the same scene.
I also think that as photographers, we care more about it than average folks. This was one of my most popular photos on social media this year.
Here’s the latest of my fur baby. He’s my most cooperative model - works for cookie pieces and never complains if I have to reshoot or make adjustments to his pose. When he sees me pick up the camera he knows it’s cookie time and he gets extra cooperative.
Cropped to bring him out of the center and line up his eyes with the rule of thirds, a little selective sharpening and some dodging.
Sunset last night. Debated about leaving/cropping the tower and finally went with leaving it in. Cooled the w/b a bit too- it looked a little overcooked even SOOC....