coastalconn
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,594
- Reaction score
- 3,635
- Location
- Old Saybrook, CT
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
You totally missed my point I was talking about pure pixel density to answer BCSteve.Nope, the D800 has the equivalent of 15.4 MP on a DX sized sonsor where the D7100 packs in 24. I think a FF camera with the pixel density of the D7100 would be around 54 mp. That's why I'm still a big fan of DX it can in theory record more detail if you have a lens that allows it...
Its not an equivalent at all, 36MP from a D800 is going to be better than 24mp in a D7100. For several reasons, primarily.
Surface area of the sensor: Much larger on a D800
Pixel Pitch : better on the D800
Pixel Area: The D800 has larger pixels which gather light better and equate to a better signal to noise ratio. '
I would much rather have the D800 over the D7100 . Both are a fantasy for me right now in any event. However the D800 has it where it counts. More pixels do not mean better necessarily in any event.
You are obviously not a birder, I will take smaller less light gathering pixel that I can crop more any day.
This simple sparrow shot was cropped down to 1735x2690 (4.6mp) from my D7100... On a D800 I would have been left with 1388x2152 (3mp) This would affect print size by 50%... Just saying...
House Sparrow in the sun by krisinct, on Flickr