photoguy99
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,485
- Reaction score
- 313
- Banned
- #16
it's not even good photography.........................
What does "good photography" mean?
it's not even good photography.........................
My Eyes didn't catch this. Is this someone's review? It doesn't even make sense the whole paragraph.It's all in the eye of the beholder, but it looks ok to me - not my kind of thing though.
had to smile at the BS further down the page:
"The world is bursting with box stores carrying products that you’ll probably see in 9 out of 10 of your neighbor’s homes. You are unique. We know you want more than cheap reproductions and prints that have been mass produced a million times over. Each and every work of art on Zatista is 100% unique, 100% original. Just like you, there is only one. Choose different. Choose the original."
It's one of 20, and there is nothing to say that they won't do another print run.
"There is only one...except this one time when there are twenty..."
I don't want anything naked. If it at least had a Dog it would be worth it. But this with the sun on top of it? God No. My 7 year old niece captures even better pictures and she doesn't even know anything other than what to click to get the picture.Nice classical composition, well defined color palette, goes with the couch. What else is there? You want a naked girl or something? Well, the wife doesn't, so there.
Put them on Amazon for $450 each. Maybe someone will buy them, and if they do, more power to everyone involved.I don't want anything naked. If it at least had a Dog it would be worth it. But this with the sun on top of it? God No. My 7 year old niece captures even better pictures and she doesn't even know anything other than what to click to get the picture.Nice classical composition, well defined color palette, goes with the couch. What else is there? You want a naked girl or something? Well, the wife doesn't, so there.
Thank you. So I am not the only one who sees the ugliness of it.......Even the most clueless can make greater pictures than this with a decent camera.DinoThePhotoGuy said:isn't it the worst pic ever? and yet he/she wants to sell for $450.00? seriously?
Amazon.com Art Abstract sink Archival Ink-Jet Thurston Howes
darn?? wrong category. How do I move it to off topic or something?
It is a terribly weak composition, and an even worse image. Pretty execrable, to put it politely. Big. Steaming. Pile.
So, now you know that you should be offering your shots on Amazon and elsewhere for $450 for the worst of them, up to $Name $Your $Price for the best of your work.Thank you. So I am not the only one who sees the ugliness of it.......Even the most clueless can make greater pictures than this with a decent camera.DinoThePhotoGuy said:isn't it the worst pic ever? and yet he/she wants to sell for $450.00? seriously?
Amazon.com Art Abstract sink Archival Ink-Jet Thurston Howes
darn?? wrong category. How do I move it to off topic or something?
It is a terribly weak composition, and an even worse image. Pretty execrable, to put it politely. Big. Steaming. Pile.
when you see one you'll know from miles awayit's not even good photography.........................
What does "good photography" mean?
So, now you know that you should be offering your shots on Amazon and elsewhere for $450 for the worst of them, up to $Name $Your $Price for the best of your work.Thank you. So I am not the only one who sees the ugliness of it.......Even the most clueless can make greater pictures than this with a decent camera.DinoThePhotoGuy said:isn't it the worst pic ever? and yet he/she wants to sell for $450.00? seriously?
Amazon.com Art Abstract sink Archival Ink-Jet Thurston Howes
darn?? wrong category. How do I move it to off topic or something?
It is a terribly weak composition, and an even worse image. Pretty execrable, to put it politely. Big. Steaming. Pile.
Isn't that good news?
would you buy it then? I wouldn't if I were a trillionaireWell sure it's ugly. That's not the same thing as bad.
I kind of like it. A bit thin but an interesting looking thing. And it goes with the couch.
Why not? People pay lots more for what they consider the best photographs.Buckster said:So, now you know that you should be offering your shots on Amazon and elsewhere for $450 for the worst of them, up to $Name $Your $Price for the best of your work.
Isn't that good news?
absolutely good news.......but if the worst images can be sold for $450. No one will buy the best and the house
Just because it's not your bag doesn't mean it's not someone else's. Ever been to a museum of modern art?would you buy it then? I wouldn't if I were a trillionaireWell sure it's ugly. That's not the same thing as bad.
I kind of like it. A bit thin but an interesting looking thing. And it goes with the couch.
Well sure it's ugly. That's not the same thing as bad.
I kind of like it. A bit thin but an interesting looking thing. And it goes with the couch.