I don't think of it as elitism so much as I think of it as Nikon sucks. :lmao:
Joking aside, I was after a camera that shot fast in continuous mode and was generally a good all around amateur camera that allowed me to grow into my hobby. Given my interest in fast moving subject (shoot sports, running dogs, playing kids, landscapes) my research took me to Canon. I looked at the Nikon line closely but found several online resources that pointed me to Canon based on my interests in photography.
Here's one such site:
How to pick a digital SLR camera
From that site, here's a comparison for Nikon.
If you look at the competitors for each camera the 40D's ($1,000) rival in the Nikon line is the $1,800 D300. I know this is a vast over simplification, but when you go through the rest of that site you'll see that based upon my interests the Canon is probably my best choice. The only regret I have is talking myself out of the 50D at this point. But I am in love with my 40D.
:mrgreen: