Jennifer2010
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
For those with technical knowledge, please help me settle an argument with a friend.
The two cams in question are the Sony HDR-TG5V and the Sony TX200V.
One of us claims that the Sony HDR-TG5V has better low lighting performance than the 200V, and a side by side video in poor lighting produced better results from the TG5V.
This person thinks the reason behind this is because the TG5V has an f 1.8 aperture lens while the 200V has a f 3.5 lens.
The other person claims that this doesn't matter, and the 200V still receives 30% more light than the TG5V because it has a larger sensor.
Who's right, and who can explain why the TG5V allegedly produced better results in low lighting?
HDR-TG5V
TX200V
Thank you!
The two cams in question are the Sony HDR-TG5V and the Sony TX200V.
One of us claims that the Sony HDR-TG5V has better low lighting performance than the 200V, and a side by side video in poor lighting produced better results from the TG5V.
This person thinks the reason behind this is because the TG5V has an f 1.8 aperture lens while the 200V has a f 3.5 lens.
The other person claims that this doesn't matter, and the 200V still receives 30% more light than the TG5V because it has a larger sensor.
Who's right, and who can explain why the TG5V allegedly produced better results in low lighting?
HDR-TG5V
- Imaging Sensor : 1/5" Exmor CMOS sensor with ClearVid array
- Processor : BIONZ image processor
- Lens Type : Carl Zeiss® Vario-Tessar®
- Aperture : F 1.8-2.3
TX200V
- Imaging Sensor : 1/2.3" Exmor[SUP]®[/SUP] R CMOS Sensor
- Processor : BIONZ[SUP]®[/SUP]
- Lens Type : Carl Zeiss[SUP]®[/SUP] Vario-Tessar[SUP]®[/SUP]
- Aperture : f 3.5-4.8
Thank you!