Centropolis
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2011
- Messages
- 59
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I currently own two mirrorless "systems".
1) Olympus E-PL2 with 2 kit lenses and a Sigma DN 19mm f/2.8
2) Sony A6000 with kit PZ 16-50mm and a few Minolta MC/MD lenses
My question is not so much with which specific camera would be better, but rather, if you have a fresh start, would you invest in a micro 4/3 or a Sony APS-C E-mount system? Assuming you don't have a ton of money to spend on both, would you rather buy better lenses for m43 or Sony E-Mount?
The reason why I ask is that I've read recently that Sony is "moving away" from APS-C development and focusing on FF. This has me worried that if I spend good money on say the 16-70mm Zeiss f4 zoom, that in 3 years, there will not be any new E-Mount bodies to upgrade to.
On the other side, Oly and Panasonic seem to be moving fast and forward with the m4/3 system.
Any comments?
1) Olympus E-PL2 with 2 kit lenses and a Sigma DN 19mm f/2.8
2) Sony A6000 with kit PZ 16-50mm and a few Minolta MC/MD lenses
My question is not so much with which specific camera would be better, but rather, if you have a fresh start, would you invest in a micro 4/3 or a Sony APS-C E-mount system? Assuming you don't have a ton of money to spend on both, would you rather buy better lenses for m43 or Sony E-Mount?
The reason why I ask is that I've read recently that Sony is "moving away" from APS-C development and focusing on FF. This has me worried that if I spend good money on say the 16-70mm Zeiss f4 zoom, that in 3 years, there will not be any new E-Mount bodies to upgrade to.
On the other side, Oly and Panasonic seem to be moving fast and forward with the m4/3 system.
Any comments?