penfolderoldo
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2011
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 23
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Website
- www.albapics,co,uk
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Thought i'd throw this out there to see if there's a consensus...
If you were shooting fast action sports like football, rugby, etc and assuming the price was roughly equal, which would you rather have - a used 50D or a used 1D mark II? Different AF systems I know, and a faster fps rate on the mk II, but if you were printing large would the extra 7MP on the 50D make up for it? Would the 8MP on the 1D mk II be enough for 11 x 14 prints?
The AF on the 50D comes in for some stick, just wondering how true to life that is for sports?
(and no, opting for a 1D mark III / IV isn't allowed, cos they're both well outside the budget!)
If you were shooting fast action sports like football, rugby, etc and assuming the price was roughly equal, which would you rather have - a used 50D or a used 1D mark II? Different AF systems I know, and a faster fps rate on the mk II, but if you were printing large would the extra 7MP on the 50D make up for it? Would the 8MP on the 1D mk II be enough for 11 x 14 prints?
The AF on the 50D comes in for some stick, just wondering how true to life that is for sports?
(and no, opting for a 1D mark III / IV isn't allowed, cos they're both well outside the budget!)