D750 sensor rated 93 by DxOMark

[ruifo]

Nikon D750 versus Nikon D810 versus Nikon D600 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark

Very very very good, but still 1 point below the D610/D600:

• D750: 93 pts | color depth: 24.8 | dynamic range: 14.5 | ISO: 2956
• D610: 94 pts | color depth: 25.1 | dynamic range: 14.4 | ISO: 2925
• D810: 97 pts | color depth: 25.7 | dynamic range: 14.8 | ISO: 2853

Nikon cameras sensors Top 10 Ranking:

1. 97: D810
2. 96: D800E
3. 95: D800
4. 94: D600 + D610
5. 93: D750
6. 89: Df + D4 + D4S
7. 88: D3X
8. 84: D5200
9. 83: D7100 + D5300
10. 82: D3S + D3300

 

[D-B-J]

WOO! I'm in the top 3!

 

[D-B-J]

Oh. Wait. Yeah. That D750 is cool too..

 

[coastalconn]

WOO! I'm in the top 3!

Woohoo me 2! Makes my deal look even better..

Oh. Wait. Yeah. That D750 is cool too..

Yup it does it look pretty good!

 

[Vince.1551]

I feel DXOMark should normalize the test results to 16mpx to give more justice to lower mpx cameras


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Derrel]

D750, a very solid performer, for $1,000 less than the D810.Outstanding dynamic range capability, 2nd overall.

ttp://Nikon D750 Sensor Measurement: Outstanding performance for Dynamic Range - DxOMark

 

[DevC]

They are all winners in my book.


Although i'm surprised it scored lower than the d610.

 

[astroNikon]

Nikon D750 versus Nikon D810 versus Nikon D600 - Side by side camera comparison - DxOMark

Very very very good, but still 1 point below the D610/D600:

• D750: 93 pts | color depth: 24.8 | dynamic range: 14.5 | ISO: 2956
• D610: 94 pts | color depth: 25.1 | dynamic range: 14.4 | ISO: 2925
• D810: 97 pts | color depth: 25.7 | dynamic range: 14.8 | ISO: 2853

Nikon cameras sensors Top 10 Ranking:

1. 97: D810
2. 96: D800E
3. 95: D800
4. 94: D600 + D610
5. 93: D750
6. 89: Df + D4 + D4S
7. 88: D3X
8. 84: D5200
9. 83: D7100 + D5300
10. 82: D3S + D3300

It's interesting how little weight in the calculation they give ISO performance
because the D3S ISO is rated at 3253 (higher than most of the other Fx cameras) whereas the d7100 is rated at 1256 ISO
and yet the d3s rates below the d7100 in overall.

 

[dannylightning]

as long as you are happy with the photos you take with what you own is really want matters. that is how I see it.

 

[Solarflare]

They are all pretty equal, I'd say.

The native ISO 12800 on the D810 and D750, as well as the native ISO 64 on the D810, are probably much more important in practice than these minor differences.

 

[Derrel]

I feel DXOMark should normalize the test results to 16mpx to give more justice to lower mpx cameras

Well, according to their article from 2009,and their current chart explanatory info panel (hover mouse over to reveal the info panel) they normalize to 8 megapixels which is roughly a 12 x 8 inch print at 300 dpi.

Detailed computation of DxOMark Sensor normalization - DxOMark

 

[rexbobcat]

I'm seriously considering switching to the D750. Given Canon's recent track record of disappointments, Nikon just seems to care more and is looking pretty nice right now.

Plus I'm getting real tired of Canon's pathetic lack of shadow detail. It's sad.

 

[D-B-J]

I'm seriously considering switching to the D750. Given Canon's recent track record of disappointments, Nikon just seems to care more and is looking pretty nice right now.

Plus I'm getting real tired of Canon's pathetic lack of shadow detail. It's sad.

Except canon had the 135 f2 and the 85 1.2 [emoji106][emoji106][emoji106][emoji106]

 

[rexbobcat]

I'm seriously considering switching to the D750. Given Canon's recent track record of disappointments, Nikon just seems to care more and is looking pretty nice right now.

Plus I'm getting real tired of Canon's pathetic lack of shadow detail. It's sad.

Except canon had the 135 f2 and the 85 1.2 [emoji106][emoji106][emoji106][emoji106]

Yeah I know. >< That's why I'm also just considering selling my Canon lenses and keeping the body. Just for those two haha

 

[D-B-J]

I'm seriously considering switching to the D750. Given Canon's recent track record of disappointments, Nikon just seems to care more and is looking pretty nice right now.

Plus I'm getting real tired of Canon's pathetic lack of shadow detail. It's sad.

Except canon had the 135 f2 and the 85 1.2 [emoji106][emoji106][emoji106][emoji106]

Yeah I know. >< That's why I'm also just considering selling my Canon lenses and keeping the body. Just for those two haha

Seriously. I'm upset there isn't a GOOD nikon option. It's either the old 135 f2 DC or the expensive Zeiss.